Created 14 criteria in harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/tests/atomic-rubric.yaml:1.
Extracted context verbatim into harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/tests/grader-context.md:1.
Correctly used zero Crux criteria because penalties target individual dimensions.
Staging validation passed.
Form and coverage detectors both report clear with HIGH confidence.
The rubric is currently staged for grading; use --restore before packaging.
dimmention-misapplication is fine.
rubric-clarity has an issue.
-- Verdict: material issues. The earlier ambiguities are fixed, but Ground Truth accepts “unmerged or deprecated” prototype commits while the top Thought Partnership tier requires “unmerged” commits. That difference could change the score for an accurate response.
atomic-rubic.md.txt - is actually a yaml file that notebook can't intake
as yaml.
reference-runs-01.md is grader results and evaluation at the point of
'atomic grades'
Removed
┌───────────────────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Claim │ Why │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 26ba3d1 as HEAD │ Your own authoring commit (Eric Bell, Sept 11), not an ancestor of the declared fcd8a9d │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ "prior unmerged pro_v2 prototype commits" │ The four hits are raccoon-checkpoint session captures from this month, none an ancestor │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Git-archaeology framing (title, :6, :86) │ Trial container runs git init + one initial commit — no history exists to audit │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ theProject-voice │ Mismatched task.toml's potion-voice; the rubric doesn't need to name the repo │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Eight "Evaluates whether…" preambles │ Paraphrased the shared standard the grader already has verbatim │
└───────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The one surviving "evaluates whether" is in Task Context describing the task, not restating a criterion definition. That one's fine.
Preserved and restored
All your structural improvements survive: the Heavy Penalties section, the Integrity routing note, the TP/Narrow-Correctness decoupling note, the Fabricated
Verification penalty, and the Ground-Truth cross-reference that removes the duplicate enumeration.
Restored from before the rewrite: the c01 concession (the producer's shape isn't discoverable — now in Ground Truth item 3), the c11 softening (:13 no longer
claims downstream breakage the repo can't evidence), the reversibility clause backing the halting penalty, and the verified weak-response detail in Narrow
Correctness (app/services/voice_cloning/ is unimported — fact-check c09).
Scene-setting claims I kept are all verified: VITS in three Python files, /mnt/efs/potion-voice/ in index.js:134, .fifo queue URLs in the pm2 configs.
