10583d64ef54b75661040e4d5cb5b6b6e5437359
Removed ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Claim │ Why │ ├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 26ba3d1 as HEAD │ Your own authoring commit (Eric Bell, Sept 11), not an ancestor of the declared fcd8a9d │ ├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ "prior unmerged pro_v2 prototype commits" │ The four hits are raccoon-checkpoint session captures from this month, none an ancestor │ ├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Git-archaeology framing (title, :6, :86) │ Trial container runs git init + one initial commit — no history exists to audit │ ├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ theProject-voice │ Mismatched task.toml's potion-voice; the rubric doesn't need to name the repo │ ├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Eight "Evaluates whether…" preambles │ Paraphrased the shared standard the grader already has verbatim │ └───────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ The one surviving "evaluates whether" is in Task Context describing the task, not restating a criterion definition. That one's fine. Preserved and restored All your structural improvements survive: the Heavy Penalties section, the Integrity routing note, the TP/Narrow-Correctness decoupling note, the Fabricated Verification penalty, and the Ground-Truth cross-reference that removes the duplicate enumeration. Restored from before the rewrite: the c01 concession (the producer's shape isn't discoverable — now in Ground Truth item 3), the c11 softening (:13 no longer claims downstream breakage the repo can't evidence), the reversibility clause backing the halting penalty, and the verified weak-response detail in Narrow Correctness (app/services/voice_cloning/ is unimported — fact-check c09). Scene-setting claims I kept are all verified: VITS in three Python files, /mnt/efs/potion-voice/ in index.js:134, .fifo queue URLs in the pm2 configs.
Description
No description provided
Languages
JavaScript
31.2%
Shell
28.8%
Python
24.4%
TypeScript
14%
Dockerfile
1.6%