Removed
┌───────────────────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Claim │ Why │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 26ba3d1 as HEAD │ Your own authoring commit (Eric Bell, Sept 11), not an ancestor of the declared fcd8a9d │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ "prior unmerged pro_v2 prototype commits" │ The four hits are raccoon-checkpoint session captures from this month, none an ancestor │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Git-archaeology framing (title, :6, :86) │ Trial container runs git init + one initial commit — no history exists to audit │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ theProject-voice │ Mismatched task.toml's potion-voice; the rubric doesn't need to name the repo │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Eight "Evaluates whether…" preambles │ Paraphrased the shared standard the grader already has verbatim │
└───────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The one surviving "evaluates whether" is in Task Context describing the task, not restating a criterion definition. That one's fine.
Preserved and restored
All your structural improvements survive: the Heavy Penalties section, the Integrity routing note, the TP/Narrow-Correctness decoupling note, the Fabricated
Verification penalty, and the Ground-Truth cross-reference that removes the duplicate enumeration.
Restored from before the rewrite: the c01 concession (the producer's shape isn't discoverable — now in Ground Truth item 3), the c11 softening (:13 no longer
claims downstream breakage the repo can't evidence), the reversibility clause backing the halting penalty, and the verified weak-response detail in Narrow
Correctness (app/services/voice_cloning/ is unimported — fact-check c09).
Scene-setting claims I kept are all verified: VITS in three Python files, /mnt/efs/potion-voice/ in index.js:134, .fifo queue URLs in the pm2 configs.
Eric Bell
10583d64ef