19 lines
895 B
Markdown
19 lines
895 B
Markdown
|
||
› is the new notion of 'tier' a proper notion or something concocted for this last request?
|
||
|
||
|
||
• It was inferred—and largely concocted—for the request, not an established notion in this repository.
|
||
|
||
I found no existing pro_v2 value, tier field, tier-specific model, checkpoint, queue contract, or historical implementation. I invented:
|
||
|
||
- The accepted tier locations.
|
||
- VoiceCloning.tier.
|
||
- training_model_tier.
|
||
- Tier-aware completion rules.
|
||
- pro_v2/ artifact namespaces.
|
||
|
||
The tests only validate that invented contract. They do not prove it matches the real producer.
|
||
|
||
Before keeping this change, we need the actual pro_v2 request payload and intended semantics. If it is merely an account plan, most of this implementation—especially artifact
|
||
isolation—is likely inappropriate. I should have flagged that uncertainty before implementing it.
|
||
|