From fe4e1cf6b8818675bdf9aa05157590d0e98747b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Bell <eric@polymorph.co>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 18:31:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] all detectors

---
 .../detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json   |  4 +-
 .../detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md  | 40 ++++++++-----------
 .../detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json       |  4 +-
 .../detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md      |  4 +-
 .../detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json |  4 +-
 .../detector-cross-task-reference.md          |  6 +--
 ...ector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json |  4 +-
 .../detector-dimension-misapplication.md      | 18 ++++-----
 ...ector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json |  2 +-
 ...detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json |  4 +-
 .../detector-good-response-defined.md         |  6 +--
 ...r-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json |  4 +-
 .../detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md  |  8 ++--
 ...detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json |  4 +-
 .../detector-offline-verifiability.md         |  8 ++--
 .../detector-over-hinting.inputs.json         |  4 +-
 .../detectors/detector-over-hinting.md        |  8 +++-
 .../detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json       |  4 +-
 .../detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md      |  8 ++--
 .../detector-rubric-generality.inputs.json    |  4 +-
 .../detectors/detector-rubric-generality.md   |  8 ++--
 21 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)

diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json
index 8f90338..842ae50 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:27:42.012Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:14.191Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "8f77a2181fa69c16c350c131cea4dcea31f4eddb36b77fb2833a5eee67d427ae",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md
index ebff5f8..943bab1 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 detector: detector-answer-obviousness
-verdict: obvious
-confidence: HIGH
+verdict: partial
+confidence: MEDIUM
 ---
 
 Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
@@ -10,40 +10,34 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## What the prompt asks
 
-The user suspects the two worker handlers fetch MongoDB records by ID without checking ownership against the job's `userId`. The request is to audit all database queries across both handlers and enforce tenant isolation. A thoughtful engineer would find the worker and service calls, obtain the job owner from a trusted message context, scope reads and mutations to it, reject foreign records, and verify the workers still run.
+The user asks to audit both background workers and enforce tenant authorization on MongoDB reads and writes. The prompt identifies ID-only queries as the suspected defect, but leaves implementation structure to the engineer.
 
 ## Per-expectation assessment
 
-### Trusted owner before the first lookup — obvious
+### Trusted identity and owner-scoped queries — obvious
 
-- **What the rubric requires:** “An unscoped database lookup ... cannot be used to establish or ‘discover’ a trusted owner `userId`.”
-- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** Yes. The prompt says record IDs in SQS payloads must be checked against the job's `userId`; deriving the owner from whichever record an unchecked ID happens to find would make that comparison circular.
+- **What the rubric requires:** “The decisive security requirement is ensuring argument 1 contains” the document ID and user ID.
+- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** Yes. Checking an ID against the job owner is the core request. Getting the owner from a record selected by an unchecked ID would be circular.
 - **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious`.
 
-### Record and tenant-wide query scoping — obvious
+### Complete audit and safe rejection — obvious
 
-- **What the rubric requires:** “queries MUST combine the document ID and user identity” for a specific record, while tenant-wide queries “MUST filter by `{ userId }`”; “`_id` is **NOT** required” for those collection-level queries.
-- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** Yes. This now maps the user's ownership goal to both single-record and multi-record operations without demanding an ID where none is relevant.
+- **What the rubric requires:** “If an incoming message lacks” the identity field, reject it without unscoped queries or mutations; “Thoroughly audits and updates all unscoped query call sites across both worker handlers.”
+- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** Yes. The request names both workers and strict isolation, so partial scoping or mutation on rejection would fail it.
 - **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious`.
 
-### Mongoose argument placement — obvious
+### Preserve execution and verify — obvious
 
-- **What the rubric requires:** “The query filter in argument 1 (`conditions`) MUST explicitly contain the `userId` filter”.
-- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** Yes. A filter in options or an unused extra argument does not constrain the query. The rubric now says five arguments alone are not a security bypass when argument one is scoped.
+- **What the rubric requires:** “Worker processes run cleanly without runtime exceptions” and “Multi-tenant scoping and state transitions are verified.”
+- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** Yes. A security change that crashes the workers or is not checked does not satisfy the requested implementation.
 - **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious`.
 
-### Safe rejection and status writes — obvious
+### Full handler rewrite as a categorical failure — not-obvious
 
-- **What the rubric requires:** “background workers must halt processing cleanly without mutating foreign tenant records” and status updates that are written “must be scoped exclusively to the authenticated user's own record”.
-- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** Yes. A safe rejection can omit a status write; any write made must respect the same tenant boundary. This aligns with the requested security behavior.
-- **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious`.
-
-### Worker stability and verification — obvious
-
-- **What the rubric requires:** “Background job processing must handle exceptions gracefully” and refactoring must “systematically cover all query entry points” in both handlers.
-- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** Yes. The user asked for both workers, and a refactor that crashes or leaves one worker unscoped does not complete that request.
-- **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious`.
+- **What the rubric requires:** “Rebuilding entire worker handlers from scratch rather than fixing query scoping in existing handlers and services” is a Thought Partnership failure.
+- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** This is an overstated-universality finding. A carefully tested rewrite that preserves behavior and enforces ownership could satisfy the request; the prompt does not rule it out. A gratuitous rewrite can be judged on its actual complexity and risk, but the method alone is not a categorical failure.
+- **Verdict for this expectation:** `not-obvious`.
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-The rubric's expected choices now follow the prompt: trusted job identity, owner-scoped queries, safe rejection, and a working two-worker implementation. It credits tenant-wide queries without `_id` and does not require an unrelated queue-timing change or a mandatory error-status write. The remaining question of whether actual SQS messages carry `userId` is a factual-package issue, not a non-obvious implementation choice. No reference runs exist to cross-check this prospective verdict.
+Most expectations follow plainly from the prompt. The implementation-method restriction is a secondary unsupported requirement, so the verdict is `partial`. No reference runs exist to show how this clause is applied.
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json
index 44ac439..71dd37a 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:03:08.852Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:14.715Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "87449e99a8753063192c16208011911372d67a5c23e7effb2d102de2bfa28afa",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md
index 12813b9..8e9d38c 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 > Audit all db queries across both worker handlers and make them enforce strict multi-tenant authorization so users cannot access or modify records belonging to other tenants.
 
-`reference-runs/` is empty. The rubric's “Missing Utility Module Startup Crash” is a possible defect in an agent's change, not evidence of baseline environment failure.
+The reference-runs directory contains no scored run. The prompt concerns unscoped tenant queries, and the baseline workers do contain ID-only lookups and updates consistent with that premise.
 
 ## Rationale
 
-The no-evidence trigger applies. There is no trial trajectory showing dependency installation trouble, unrelated test failure, or an agent workaround, and no scored run to check for infrastructure corruption or artifact drift. The prompt's stated tenant-isolation concern is consistent with unscoped queries in the shipped workers. Re-run when reference runs supply an environment signal.
+There is no reference-run trajectory or verifier result from which to judge incidental build trouble, corrupted trials, or package drift. The rubric's startup-crash examples describe possible agent-introduced defects, not baseline environment failures. The workspace premise is consistent with the source. Re-run this detector after reference runs provide an environment signal.
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json
index 44ac439..46d5b33 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:03:08.852Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:15.229Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "87449e99a8753063192c16208011911372d67a5c23e7effb2d102de2bfa28afa",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.md
index dbdf00d..6db3345 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.md
@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Verbatim grounding
 
-> The goal of this task is to audit and refactor the backend background worker job handlers (`voice-synthsizer-job-handler` and `voice-cloning-job-handler`) and their underlying service wrappers
+> The goal is to audit and refactor background SQS worker handlers (`voice-synthsizer-job-handler` and `voice-cloning-job-handler`) and database service wrappers in `potion-voice`
 
-This points to the source repository's worker and service files, not to a separate graded task.
+These are source-repository components and the source repository name.
 
 ## Rationale
 
-The current rubric and instruction contain no sibling-task title, comparison, or unresolved external task reference. The task can be read on its own terms; its other scoring issues are covered by other detectors.
+Neither the instruction nor the resolved rubric compares this task with a sibling task or relies on another task's prompt, workspace, or rubric. Its file and model names are local context. Verdict: `clean`.
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json
index d63a5fb..779bb5c 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:10:59.575Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:15.766Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "54d15a4ff7980b26b091e859e65bba2b894c34881bffddf67bbde3cf4816550d",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.md
index 3702486..92ea392 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 detector: detector-dimension-misapplication
-verdict: clean
+verdict: partial-misapplication
 confidence: HIGH
 ---
 
@@ -10,18 +10,16 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Verbatim grounding
 
-> - **Impact**: Apply a heavy penalty to **Broader Correctness**.
+> - **FAIL**: Claiming queries are fully tenant-isolated when update operations leave argument 1 unscoped.
 
-This is the impact for unscoped database queries, a security defect.
+> - **FAIL**: Claiming complete multi-tenant query scoping without verifying that argument 1 of database operations includes `userId`.
 
-> - **Impact**: Apply a heavy penalty to **Narrow Correctness**.
+> - **FAIL**: Rebuilding entire worker handlers from scratch rather than fixing query scoping in existing handlers and services.
 
-This is the impact for a missing module startup crash.
-
-> - **Impact**: Apply a heavy penalty to **Common Sense** and **Narrow Correctness**.
-
-This is the impact for starting dependent lookups before parent IDs resolve and causing a runtime error. The Grading Standard allows one defect to affect multiple criteria when it genuinely touches each; it does not treat this pairing as double-charging.
+The Grading Standard's Broader Correctness criterion asks whether the agent shows “good judgment for when to reuse existing abstractions (and code paths, logic, etc), vs. creating entirely new code?” Thought Partnership concerns whether the agent helps the user ask and answer the right questions.
 
 ## Rationale
 
-The rubric now names only canonical grading criteria. Security failures route to Broader Correctness, startup execution failure to Narrow Correctness, and missing verification to Verification & Thoroughness. The dependency-order mistake can plausibly reflect both an expert-obvious judgment lapse and executable-code failure, so the two-criterion impact is defensible. No reference-run grades exist to show criterion drift. No invented scoring axis appears.
+The unscoped query itself belongs to Broader Correctness, and a startup or dependency-order crash belongs to Narrow Correctness. The Integrity clause is conditioned on an agent claim about its own implementation; a merely unverified completeness claim belongs to Verification & Thoroughness, which has its own clause here.
+
+The Thought Partnership failure about rewriting entire handlers measures implementation scope, maintainability, and reuse of existing code. Those are Broader Correctness concerns under the standard. It is a secondary criterion clause, so this is `partial-misapplication`, not a misrouted heavy penalty. No reference-run grades exist to check for grade drift.
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json
index bf6ad44..d7242e4 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:25:02.197Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:16.277Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json
index 44ac439..6473cf0 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:03:08.852Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:16.780Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "87449e99a8753063192c16208011911372d67a5c23e7effb2d102de2bfa28afa",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.md
index 3ab8334..a7d4140 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.md
@@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Positive target present?
 
-The rubric says: “All document lookups, updates, and deletes by ID across primary and secondary models (`UserAudioProfile`, `VoiceCloning`, `Salutation`, `Recording`) must enforce `userId` scoping.” It also states where tenant filters go in Mongoose calls, credits either owner-safe recording-ID path, describes queue timing, and requires owner-scoped error-status writes. These are affirmative implementation targets, not merely a list of failure examples.
+The rubric says that “All primary and secondary MongoDB queries and updates across workers and service wrappers enforce `userId` scoping in argument 1, preventing cross-tenant access.” It also specifies the owner source, clean rejection when identity is absent, and the single-record versus tenant-wide query conditions. The positive criteria describe both the code change and the checks a strong response performs.
 
 ## What the grader has to infer
 
-The Key AI Failure Modes list is negative, and the short evaluation bullets mostly say “Fails if.” The grader still has the Core Technical Requirements as a concrete positive target. Whether the queue requirement belongs in this task, and how to map “Best Practices” to the standard, are separate scope and dimension issues.
+The heavy penalties and FAIL bullets list important defects, but the PASS bullets and Ground Truth supply the corresponding success conditions. The grader need not infer the central tenant-isolation target merely by negating the penalties.
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-A grader can recognize the intended strong security refactor from the requirements section. The rubric defines good despite its remaining scoring and factual issues.
+The rubric gives a concrete positive target for the main request and its safety boundaries. Verdict: `defines-good`.
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json
index 852b5df..f473724 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:32:48.449Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:17.294Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "d77f527d018604f9edad3a2aab276169de7bae20418554b1ffd093129212f7f7",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md
index ec6d6ba..55ce131 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 detector: detector-good-response-exhaustiveness
 verdict: exhaustive
-confidence: HIGH
+confidence: MEDIUM
 ---
 
 Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
@@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Plausible strong-response approaches
 
-The prompt asks for an implementation across two workers. A focused solution can scope record reads and writes to the job's user, reject missing or foreign ownership cleanly, and retain unrelated queue timing. A broader solution may also improve queue timing. A worker can use direct owner-scoped lookups or first resolve an owner-scoped parent record before querying dependent records. If the expected user identity is absent from an incoming message, clean rejection is a reasonable safe outcome. The prompt does not invite a build-versus-buy or assessment-only approach.
+The prompt asks for a security implementation across two workers. A focused repair may add owner conditions to existing calls and safely reject missing identity. A broader refactor may share tenant-filter helpers or reorganize the affected code while preserving behavior. Either may retain the baseline queue timing or improve it. The prompt does not pose a build-versus-buy or answer-only fork.
 
 ## Coverage in the rubric
 
-The rubric's primary success target is that "all database lookups and update operations" enforce `userId` scoping across both workers. Its queue ground truth now says that retaining deletion at queue entry is pre-existing behavior and that strict query scoping satisfies the primary request, so the focused implementation has a strong-response path. The rubric also says rejected jobs must halt cleanly and permits rejection without a status write. Its collection-query rule allows tenant-wide operations without `_id`. Nothing in the rubric requires one particular helper or lookup sequence, provided the owner comes from job context and each database operation is authorized. No reference runs exist for a run-specific penalty assessment.
+The rubric credits owner-scoped query conditions, safe rejection without mutation, and both recording ID sources. It does not make queue deletion timing a scored prerequisite. The clause against rebuilding entire handlers could catch a broadly accepted refactor if read too broadly, but a complete rewrite of both handlers is not itself a major approach that roughly 80% of engineers would choose for this focused fix. There are no reference runs showing a reasonable alternative receiving that deduction.
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-The current rubric leaves room for the major reasonable implementation shapes. The earlier queue-timing exclusion has been removed, so the verdict is `exhaustive`.
+The major implementation approaches have a scored home. The categorical rewrite clause is a fairness and criterion-routing concern; on the current evidence it does not exclude a broadly accepted central fork. Verdict: `exhaustive`.
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json
index 44ac439..b22d2fd 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:03:08.852Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:17.798Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "87449e99a8753063192c16208011911372d67a5c23e7effb2d102de2bfa28afa",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.md
index e50936c..7346805 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.md
@@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Findings
 
-The strongest near-miss is the queue reliability requirement:
+The strongest near-miss is the rubric's application setting:
 
-> SQS messages must remain in the queue during task execution and should only be deleted (`deleteMessageFromSQS`) after job execution and artifact storage succeed, ensuring SQS retry mechanisms function properly on failure.
+> The goal is to audit and refactor background SQS worker handlers (`voice-synthsizer-job-handler` and `voice-cloning-job-handler`) and database service wrappers in `potion-voice` to enforce strict multi-tenant data isolation by scoping all MongoDB queries with `userId`.
 
-This is checkable offline as a local call-order and failure-path property using stubs for SQS, MongoDB, and artifact storage. The core user request is also local: a test can assert that Mongoose receives filters containing the job owner's `userId` and refuses mismatched records. The rubric accepts both recording-ID paths and does not require proving a particular unavailable queue payload shape. The manifests already declare the Node dependencies used by these workers.
+The worker source, model schemas, service wrappers, and dependency manifests are shipped locally. A local test can feed worker messages and stub Mongoose, SQS, and artifact calls to inspect query conditions, rejection, and dependent call order. The rubric grades code behavior rather than live tenant data or a production deployment.
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-A competent engineer can implement and verify the scored ownership and call-order behavior from the shipped source without a live SQS queue, tenant database, or S3 bucket. Such local checks cannot prove production delivery, but the rubric asks for code behavior that a faithful fake can exercise. This is offline-verifiable; the absence of pre-existing tests affects how much verification work the agent must do, not whether the task requires the internet.
+The implementation and meaningful verification are possible from the initialized repository. Live SQS, MongoDB, and storage would add integration confidence but are not required to establish the scored ownership behavior. Verdict: `offline-verifiable`.
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-over-hinting.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-over-hinting.inputs.json
index 44ac439..ecd16ab 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-over-hinting.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-over-hinting.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:03:08.852Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:18.301Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "87449e99a8753063192c16208011911372d67a5c23e7effb2d102de2bfa28afa",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-over-hinting.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-over-hinting.md
index 5759ac9..e8810ce 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-over-hinting.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-over-hinting.md
@@ -10,8 +10,12 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Findings
 
-The closest candidate is the prompt's statement: “job handlers fetch database models using only document IDs supplied in SQS payloads without verifying that they belong to the job's userId.” It describes the suspected defect and requested security outcome. That is a genuine user requirement, not a hint toward a separately graded discovery: the agent must still find and fix every affected query. The prompt does not name the rubric's Mongoose argument-shape failure, queue-deletion condition, or error-status guard. There is no `environment/workspace.patch` with authored comments to inspect.
+The closest candidate is the prompt's diagnosis:
+
+> Specifically, job handlers fetch database models using only document IDs supplied in SQS payloads without verifying that they belong to the job's userId.
+
+This names the user's suspected security problem and the requested outcome. It does not locate every call site, provide the Mongoose argument fix, or prescribe a utility. There is no workspace patch containing authored comments.
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-The request gives useful problem context without handing over the implementation or the secondary failure modes. No added workspace comments form another hint surface.
+The prompt gives normal problem context for a security repair. The graded work still requires tracing both workers, fixing all affected queries, and verifying rejection paths. Verdict: `clean`.
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json
index 8f90338..b5beb32 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:27:42.012Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:18.818Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "8f77a2181fa69c16c350c131cea4dcea31f4eddb36b77fb2833a5eee67d427ae",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md
index c4c528b..369f6d2 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 detector: detector-rubric-clarity
 verdict: clear
-confidence: MEDIUM
+confidence: HIGH
 ---
 
 Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
@@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Material ambiguities
 
-None found in the current scoring rules. The rubric distinguishes specific-record queries from tenant-wide queries, identifies `userId` as the required owner filter, and states that five arguments alone are not a security bypass unless argument-one conditions remain unscoped. Status writes are conditional on being made, with foreign-record mutation expressly prohibited.
+None found. The first-argument ownership rule, tenant-wide query exception, missing-identity rejection, and heavy-penalty triggers give a grader concrete checks. The handling of a full rewrite is a substantive scope and dimension concern covered by other detectors; its wording does not itself create competing scoring readings.
 
 ## Copy-edit issues
 
-None found. The inline identifiers and code examples read coherently.
+None found. The rubric's code examples and schema names are legible.
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-The prior conflicts about `_id` on list queries and the five-argument penalty are resolved in the current text. A grader can apply its security requirements without choosing between conflicting readings. Whether the repository establishes the claimed SQS identity source is a factual verification question and is recorded in the fact-check report. The verdict is `clear`, with medium confidence because the actual payload producer is not shipped.
+The scoring text is internally consistent and can be applied as written. The question of whether its implementation-method preference is fair is separate from clarity, so the verdict is `clear`.
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-generality.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-generality.inputs.json
index 44ac439..f024c26 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-generality.inputs.json
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-generality.inputs.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T20:03:08.852Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-10-09T22:27:19.344Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "75042109a7aab36d9a50fe23f5ac417488f437efb25575a987c4fe35d8103b16",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "87449e99a8753063192c16208011911372d67a5c23e7effb2d102de2bfa28afa",
+    "holisticRubric": "e8f194574b68d84d92f71fedcca76d7cabf166a237aea0ef011d7d9737a5ad6c",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null
diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-generality.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-generality.md
index c16ea29..593f8d3 100644
--- a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-generality.md
+++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot-v1.0.1/harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/detectors/detector-rubric-generality.md
@@ -10,16 +10,16 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/potion-voice-user-ownership/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Load-bearing run-dependence
 
-None found. The requirements and failure examples are stated as general response properties, without relying on outcomes from particular reference runs.
+None found.
 
 ## Run-anchored phrasings
 
-None found. “Key AI Failure Modes” introduces hypothetical behavior patterns, not observed-run statistics or run-derived scoring gates.
+None found.
 
 ## Infra-framework references
 
-None found. SQS, MongoDB, and S3 are application technologies, not names of the grading framework.
+None found. SQS, MongoDB, and the worker names describe the application.
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-The rubric can be applied to a new agent without knowing how any reference run behaved. Its invented “Best Practices” axis is a dimension-mapping problem, not run anchoring.
+The PASS, FAIL, and heavy-penalty clauses describe properties of any agent's implementation and report. No criterion depends on a reference run, a run statistic, or the grading framework. Verdict: `generalizes`.