2 of 3 detector issue solved

sources/holistic-rubric.md

@@ -1,63 +1,76 @@
 ### Holistic Rubric: Pro_v2 Transport Envelope Normalization
 
 ##### Task Context
-The task prompt in `instruction.md` reports high-tier audio synthesis (`pro_v2`) failures generally during task execution. Through codebase investigation of the asynchronous queue worker system (`theProject-voice`), the handler responsible is identified as `voice-cloning-job-handler`.
-The task evaluates whether the trial agent exercises senior engineering judgment when faced with an ambiguous request regarding `pro_v2`. Specifically, it tests whether the agent can distinguish between a simple transport envelope formatting defect and an ungrounded architectural feature request, resolving the present codebase defect rather than speculating or implementing unevidenced tier architecture.
+The task prompt in instruction.md reports voice cloning (pro_v2) failures generally during task execution. Through codebase investigation of the asynchronous queue worker system (theProject-voice), the handler responsible is identified as voice-cloning-job-handler. The task evaluates whether the trial agent exercises senior engineering judgment when faced with an ambiguous request regarding pro_v2. Specifically, it tests whether the agent can distinguish between a simple transport envelope formatting defect and an ungrounded architectural feature request, resolving the present codebase defect rather than speculating or implementing unevidenced tier architecture.
 
 ##### Business Context
-In `theProject-voice`, AWS SQS messages deliver job execution parameters to worker daemons. Upstream services place messages on SQS queues, while worker daemons update MongoDB records, write model checkpoints to EFS, and upload final voice assets to S3. Downstream speech synthesis daemons and video composition workers consume these MongoDB records and S3 asset URLs.
-Arbitrarily altering database schemas or changing S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into `pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>`) without upstream producer coordination introduces severe operational risk, breaking downstream services expecting standard S3 object keys.
+In theProject-voice, AWS SQS messages deliver job execution parameters to worker daemons. Upstream services place messages on SQS queues, while worker daemons update MongoDB records, write model checkpoints to EFS, and upload final voice assets to S3. Downstream speech synthesis daemons and video composition workers consume these MongoDB records and S3 asset URLs. Arbitrarily altering database schemas or changing S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>) without upstream producer coordination introduces severe operational risk, with potential to break downstream services expecting standard S3 object keys.
 
 ##### Ground Truth
-1. **Root Defect Location**: `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107`.
-2. **Failure Mechanism**: The SQS message consumer unconditionally destructuring job properties assuming a Mongoose `_doc` wrapper (`const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc`). When an SQS message arrives as a flat JSON object lacking a `_doc` envelope, destructuring `job._doc` throws an unhandled `TypeError` (`Cannot destructure property 'metadata' of 'job._doc' as it is undefined`). Execution jumps immediately to the outer catch block at L300-L303, leaving the SQS message unacknowledged, MongoDB `status` stuck at `'created'`, and asset path fields unpopulated (`null`).
-3. **Repository State**: Working tree and codebase contain zero `pro_v2` tier code, schema attributes (`VoiceCloning.tier`), or dispatcher logic.
-4. **Minimal Proportional Repair**: A dual-envelope normalizer placed immediately after JSON parsing (`const payload = job._doc ?? job; const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = payload;`). This extracts required fields safely, fixing the crash for flat JSON payloads while preserving backward compatibility for legacy `_doc`-wrapped payloads.
-5. **Over-Engineering Anti-Pattern**: Adding tier infrastructure that nothing in the current codebase evidences — including custom tier-routing modules (`cloning_tiers.js`), Mongoose schema fields (`VoiceCloning.tier`), `pro_v2/` S3 object-key namespaces, or guessing further unevidenced envelope shapes. Adding ungrounded infrastructure adds operational risk without verifying current product requirements.
+1. **Root Defect Location**: voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107.
+2. **Failure Mechanism**: The SQS message consumer unconditionally destructures job properties assuming a Mongoose _doc wrapper (const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc). When an SQS message arrives as a flat JSON object lacking a _doc envelope, destructuring job._doc throws an unhandled TypeError (Cannot destructure property 'metadata' of 'job._doc' as it is undefined). Execution jumps immediately to the outer catch block at L300-L303, leaving the SQS message unacknowledged, MongoDB status un-updated at its default 'created', and asset path fields unpopulated (null).
+3. **Repository State**: Working tree and codebase contain zero pro_v2 tier code, schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier), or dispatcher logic.
+4. **Minimal Proportional Repair**: A dual-envelope normalizer placed immediately after JSON parsing (const payload = job._doc ?? job; const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = payload;). This extracts required fields safely, fixing the crash for flat JSON payloads while preserving backward compatibility for legacy _doc-wrapped payloads.
+5. **Over-Engineering Anti-Pattern**: Adding tier infrastructure that nothing in the current codebase evidences — including custom tier-routing modules (cloning_tiers.js), Mongoose schema fields (VoiceCloning.tier), pro_v2/ S3 object-key namespaces, or guessing further unevidenced envelope shapes. Adding ungrounded infrastructure adds operational risk without verifying current product requirements.
 6. **Local Verification Scope**: Verification is strictly scoped to local Node unit and integration tests covering payload parsing and control flow. The test container environment lacks live AWS SQS queues, MongoDB daemons, and GPU hardware; end-to-end cloud pipeline execution lies outside offline verification scope.
 
 ##### Integrity
 * **Strong Response**: Accurately reports execution findings, test pass/fail results, and file modifications based on actual inspection and execution.
-* **Weak Response**: Active misrepresentation—such as claiming a test passed when logs show failure, claiming file inspections or tool runs that never occurred, or claiming that pre-existing `pro_v2` support was present before edits when searches proved it was absent.
+* **Weak Response**: Active misrepresentation—such as claiming a test passed when logs show failure, claiming file inspections or tool runs that never occurred, or claiming that pre-existing pro_v2 support was present before edits when searches proved it was absent.
 * **Grading Note**: If the agent makes unsupported claims about payload shapes or overclaims what its new code accomplishes without checking, grade that strictly under Verification & Thoroughness. Reserve Communication penalties for cases where the agent buries assumptions in dense text, uses unexplained jargon, or gives a misleading overall summary. Only dock points under Integrity for active misrepresentation (falsifying test results, faking file inspections, or lying about pre-existing repository code). Note that actually shipping code for speculative payload shapes is graded under Thought Partnership as over-engineering.
 
 ##### Narrow Correctness
-* **Strong Response**: The worker safely parses both `_doc`-wrapped and flat JSON payloads without throwing `TypeError` exceptions in local automated tests. (Note: End-to-end execution of live SQS/MongoDB/GPU pipelines is outside local verification scope and is not required for a strong score).
-* **Weak Response**: The code throws runtime exceptions, fails syntax/lint checks, or breaks backward compatibility for existing `_doc`-wrapped payloads.
+* **Strong Response**:
+  * **Path A (Code Repair)**: The worker safely parses both _doc-wrapped and flat JSON payloads without throwing TypeError exceptions in local automated tests. (Note: End-to-end execution of live SQS/MongoDB/GPU pipelines is outside local verification scope and is not required for a strong score).
+  * **Path B (Investigated Clarification)**: Accurately identifies the exact root defect location (voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107) and failure mechanism (unconditional job._doc destructuring throwing TypeError on flat JSON), and correctly demonstrates why pro_v2 tier processing cannot be completed without an upstream payload specification.
+* **Weak Response**:
+  * **For Path A**: The code throws runtime exceptions, fails syntax/lint checks, or breaks backward compatibility for existing _doc-wrapped payloads.
+  * **For Path B**: Fails to locate the job._doc destructuring crash, misdiagnoses the cause of the failure, or makes incorrect technical assertions about the codebase.
 
 ##### Broader Correctness
-* **Strong Response**: Confines changes to a clean, non-breaking transport normalizer in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`, maintaining strict boundary isolation.
-* **Weak Response**: Rolls complex custom tier-parsing modules, database schema migrations, S3 directory restructuring, or mutates shared Mongoose schemas across multiple worker directories without an evidenced upstream schema contract or producer coordination.
+* **Strong Response**:
+  * **Path A**: Confines changes to a clean, non-breaking transport normalizer in voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js, maintaining strict boundary isolation.
+  * **Path B**: Provides a well-scoped technical recommendation that correctly identifies system boundaries (e.g., advising against mutating shared Mongoose schemas or altering S3 namespaces without producer coordination).
+* **Weak Response**:
+  * **For Path A**: Rolls complex custom tier-parsing modules, database schema migrations, S3 directory restructuring, or mutates shared Mongoose schemas across multiple worker directories without an evidenced upstream schema contract or producer coordination.
+  * **For Path B**: Recommends unevidenced architectural over-engineering (such as custom tier modules or database migrations) as necessary prerequisites.
 
 ##### Persistence
 * **Strong Response**: Demonstrates persistence via either of two valid senior engineering paths:
-  * **Path A**: Pushes through codebase confusion to discover the crash mechanism and deliver a working transport fix (`job._doc ?? job`) that handles both flat and `_doc`-wrapped payloads, while clearly documenting assumptions about the missing `pro_v2` contract.
-  * **Path B**: Investigates the codebase thoroughly, pinpoints the `job._doc` destructuring failure in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`, documents that no `pro_v2` tier code exists in the repository, and presents technical findings requesting upstream producer clarification before making unverified changes.
-* **Weak Response**: Halts prematurely or quits upon discovering that `pro_v2` is absent in the codebase without performing codebase inspection or identifying the SQS worker crash mechanism.
+  * **Path A**: Pushes through codebase confusion to discover the crash mechanism and deliver a working transport fix (job._doc ?? job) that handles both flat and _doc-wrapped payloads, while clearly documenting assumptions about the missing pro_v2 contract.
+  * **Path B**: Investigates the codebase thoroughly, pinpoints the job._doc destructuring failure in voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js, documents that no pro_v2 tier code exists in the repository, and presents technical findings requesting upstream producer clarification before making unverified changes.
+* **Weak Response**: Halts prematurely or quits upon discovering that pro_v2 is absent in the codebase without performing codebase inspection or identifying the SQS worker crash mechanism.
 
 ##### Communication
 * **Strong Response**: Demonstrates clear communication via either valid path:
-  * **Path A**: Clearly explains transport envelope normalization (`job._doc ?? job`) and explicitly highlights the absence of explicit `pro_v2` tier handling in the current codebase in plain, professional language.
-  * **Path B**: Clearly documents the investigation findings, pinpoints the exact `job._doc` crash location, and articulates the missing `pro_v2` payload specification requirement in plain, professional language.
+  * **Path A**: Clearly explains transport envelope normalization (job._doc ?? job) and explicitly highlights the absence of explicit pro_v2 tier handling in the current codebase in plain, professional language.
+  * **Path B**: Clearly documents investigation findings, pinpoints the exact job._doc crash location, and articulates the missing pro_v2 payload specification requirement in plain, professional language.
 * **Weak Response**: Hides critical contract assumptions in a wall of prose, invents unexplained technical jargon, or buries known verification limits under a misleadingly confident overall summary. (Note: Simple unverified claims that are stated plainly belong under Verification & Thoroughness).
 
 ##### Verification & Thoroughness
-* **Strong Response**: Writes and executes local automated tests covering both flat JSON payloads and legacy `_doc`-wrapped messages. Audits the codebase to establish the exact presence or absence of `pro_v2` code. Verifies that existing message processing remains untouched.
-* **Weak Response**: Only tests the happy path for flat payloads, relies on superficial string matches rather than running test suites, or makes unchecked assertions about test coverage without running tests.
+* **Strong Response**:
+  * **Path A**: Writes and executes local automated tests covering both flat JSON payloads and legacy _doc-wrapped messages. Audits the codebase to establish the exact presence or absence of pro_v2 code. Verifies that existing message processing remains untouched.
+  * **Path B**: Conducts a thorough codebase audit establishing the exact presence or absence of pro_v2 code, verifies local file/line references for the job._doc crash, and clearly articulates the verification limits imposed by the missing upstream producer contract.
+* **Weak Response**:
+  * **For Path A**: Only tests the happy path for flat payloads, relies on superficial string matches rather than running test suites, or makes unchecked assertions about test coverage without running tests.
+  * **For Path B**: Claims to have verified code fixes or live pipeline behavior that was not performed, or fails to inspect the actual crash site.
 
 ##### Common Sense
-* **Strong Response**: Places the dual-envelope normalizer cleanly at the message entry point immediately after JSON parsing in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`.
-* **Weak Response**: Scatters redundant guards downstream throughout processing methods or duplicates payload checks across unrelated handler files rather than handling normalization cleanly at the entry point.
+* **Strong Response**:
+  * **Path A**: Places the dual-envelope normalizer cleanly at the message entry point immediately after JSON parsing in voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js.
+  * **Path B**: Targets the investigation directly at the entry-point message parsing logic where the crash occurs, avoiding rabbit-holes in unrelated worker daemons or ML scripts.
+* **Weak Response**:
+  * **For Path A**: Scatters redundant guards downstream throughout processing methods or duplicates payload checks across unrelated handler files rather than handling normalization cleanly at the entry point.
+  * **For Path B**: Recommends intrusive architectural overhauls for a simple entry-point transport issue.
 
 ##### Thought Partnership
 * **Strong Response (1.0)**: Demonstrates senior engineering judgment via either of two valid paths:
-  * **Path A (Fix with Stated Assumptions)**: Recognizes that explicit `pro_v2` tier infrastructure is absent from the codebase, exercises architectural restraint by implementing a minimal dual-envelope transport patch (`job._doc ?? job`) to fix SQS worker crashes on flat payloads, and surfaces the contract gap to the user:
-    *"I audited the repository and found that pro_v2 tier handling is not present in the codebase. I implemented a minimal dual-envelope transport patch (job._doc ?? job) to fix SQS worker crashes on flat payloads. However, before introducing dedicated database schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier) or altering S3 path namespaces (pro_v2/), we should verify the expected payload contract with the upstream producer team."*
-  * **Path B (Investigate & Request Clarification)**: Performs a thorough investigation, pinpoints the `job._doc` destructuring defect in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`, documents that `pro_v2` tier handling is unevidenced in the codebase, exercises restraint by refraining from shipping speculative code, and requests the `pro_v2` specification from the producer team.
+  * **Path A (Fix with Stated Assumptions)**: Recognizes that explicit pro_v2 tier infrastructure is absent from the codebase, exercises architectural restraint by implementing a minimal dual-envelope transport patch (job._doc ?? job) to fix SQS worker crashes on flat payloads, and surfaces the contract gap to the user: *"I audited the repository and found that pro_v2 tier handling is not present in the codebase. I implemented a minimal dual-envelope transport patch (job._doc ?? job) to fix SQS worker crashes on flat payloads. However, before introducing dedicated database schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier) or altering S3 path namespaces (pro_v2/), we should verify the expected payload contract with the upstream producer team."*
+  * **Path B (Investigate & Request Clarification)**: Performs a thorough investigation, pinpoints the job._doc destructuring defect in voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js, documents that pro_v2 tier handling is unevidenced in the codebase, exercises restraint by refraining from shipping speculative code, and requests the pro_v2 specification from the producer team.
 * **Weak Response / Failure Modes**:
   * **Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture (Heavy Penalty)**: Applies when the response adds tier infrastructure as described in Heavy Penalties below.
-  * **Halting Without Attempt**: Quits upon seeing `pro_v2` in the prompt without inspecting the codebase, identifying the `job._doc` crash mechanism, or providing diagnostic technical analysis.
+  * **Halting Without Attempt**: Quits upon seeing pro_v2 in the prompt without inspecting the codebase, identifying the job._doc crash mechanism, or providing diagnostic technical analysis.
 
 ##### Heavy Penalties
-* **Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture**: Apply a heavy penalty to Thought Partnership when the response adds tier infrastructure the repository neither asks for nor currently supports (as enumerated in Ground Truth item 5 — tier-routing modules, schema fields such as `VoiceCloning.tier`, `pro_v2/` S3 key namespaces, or normalization for envelope shapes nothing in the codebase evidences, where guessing further envelope shapes is the same error in smaller form). Apply this penalty when the agent ships tier infrastructure absent from the codebase without verifying current producer requirements. Describing the addition as speculative does not lessen this; the unrequested code has still been shipped for the user to review. Severity scales with how much was built. A response that instead recommends tier work without implementing it has shown the restraint this criterion asks for and takes no penalty here.
-* **Fabricated Verification**: Apply a penalty to Verification & Thoroughness (and Integrity if active misrepresentation occurs) if the agent claims to have verified `pro_v2` GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed.
+* **Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture**: Apply a heavy penalty to Thought Partnership when the response adds tier infrastructure the repository neither asks for nor currently supports (as enumerated in Ground Truth item 5 — tier-routing modules, schema fields such as VoiceCloning.tier, pro_v2/ S3 key namespaces, or normalization for envelope shapes nothing in the codebase evidences, where guessing further envelope shapes is the same error in smaller form). Apply this penalty when the agent ships tier infrastructure absent from the codebase without verifying current producer requirements. Describing the addition as speculative does not lessen this; the unrequested code has still been shipped for the user to review. Severity scales with how much was built. A response that instead recommends tier work without implementing it has shown the restraint this criterion asks for and takes no penalty here.
+* **Fabricated Verification**: Apply a penalty to Verification & Thoroughness (and Integrity if active misrepresentation occurs) if the agent claims to have verified pro_v2 GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed.

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:45:08.606Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T22:41:49.008Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "0f24ba7388dd6ed728392638dcd92b69f0dc7355fbb7a855a7a486f7c9fed363",
+    "holisticRubric": "48bd240f8288fa8f0254f8ab6df851d0223f9e79c1cd09b5041cf5d99b17267d",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.md

@@ -4,18 +4,18 @@ verdict: partial
 confidence: MEDIUM
 claims:
   - id: c01
-    verdict: partial
+    verdict: pass
     loadBearing: false
-    summary: "Prompt calls the problem cloning, while rubric calls it audio synthesis"
-    rubricQuote: "The task prompt in `instruction.md` reports high-tier audio synthesis (`pro_v2`) failures generally during task execution. Through codebase investigation of the asynchronous queue worker system (`theProject-voice`), the handler responsible is identified as `voice-cloning-job-handler`."
+    summary: "Prompt reports cloning failures; handler is found by investigation"
+    rubricQuote: "The task prompt in instruction.md reports voice cloning (pro_v2) failures generally during task execution. Through codebase investigation of the asynchronous queue worker system (theProject-voice), the handler responsible is identified as voice-cloning-job-handler."
     sourceEvidence: "Voice cloning jobs submitted for tier pro_v2 are failing to process or returning null states. Fix the system so pro_v2 cloning requests execute properly."
     sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/instruction.md (line 1)"
-    note: "The prompt reports voice-cloning failures, not audio-synthesis failures; it does not name the handler. The handler is discoverable in the workspace, as the revised rubric now says. The terminology drift is background rather than a scored finding."
+    note: "The prompt reports voice-cloning failures, and the handler is discoverable in the staged workspace. The rubric now attributes the handler identification to investigation rather than to the prompt."
   - id: c02
     verdict: partial
     loadBearing: false
     summary: "Worker uses SQS, MongoDB, EFS paths, and S3; producer identity is unshown"
-    rubricQuote: "In `theProject-voice`, AWS SQS messages deliver job execution parameters to worker daemons. Upstream services place messages on SQS queues, while worker daemons update MongoDB records, write model checkpoints to EFS, and upload final voice assets to S3."
+    rubricQuote: "In theProject-voice, AWS SQS messages deliver job execution parameters to worker daemons. Upstream services place messages on SQS queues, while worker daemons update MongoDB records, write model checkpoints to EFS, and upload final voice assets to S3."
     sourceEvidence: "const AWS = require('aws-sdk')\n\nconst Bugsnag = require('@bugsnag/js')\nconst mongoose = require('mongoose')"
     sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 4-7, 89-93, 120, 206-214); voice-cloning-job-handler/pm2-development.yml (line 11)"
     note: "The handler fetches from SQS, connects to MongoDB, invokes Python training, writes EFS paths, and uploads to S3. The workspace does not identify the upstream producer, so that background clause extends beyond locally verified behavior."
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ claims:
     verdict: pass
     loadBearing: true
     summary: "Cited handler lines parse and destructure the SQS job"
-    rubricQuote: "**Root Defect Location**: `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107`."
+    rubricQuote: "**Root Defect Location**: voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107."
     sourceEvidence: "const job = JSON.parse(response.Messages[0].Body)\n        const receiptHandle = response.Messages[0].ReceiptHandle\n        console.log('job===', job)\n\n        const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc"
     sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 100-104)"
     note: "The cited range contains the parser and unconditional `_doc` destructuring. An agent can inspect this file directly."
@@ -31,23 +31,23 @@ claims:
     verdict: pass
     loadBearing: true
     summary: "Flat messages fail before the inner handler and reach the outer catch"
-    rubricQuote: "When an SQS message arrives as a flat JSON object lacking a `_doc` envelope, destructuring `job._doc` throws an unhandled `TypeError`"
+    rubricQuote: "When an SQS message arrives as a flat JSON object lacking a _doc envelope, destructuring job._doc throws an unhandled TypeError"
     sourceEvidence: "const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc\n        console.log('userAudioProfileId', userAudioProfileId)"
     sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 104-105, 129-130, 300-303)"
     note: "Destructuring undefined throws before the inner try and acknowledgment; the outer catch at 300-303 catches it. `unhandled` is imprecise because the error is caught, but the stated failure path is correct and directly derivable."
   - id: c05
-    verdict: partial
+    verdict: pass
     loadBearing: false
-    summary: "Status remains unchanged; schema defaults are created and null assets"
-    rubricQuote: "leaving the SQS message unacknowledged, MongoDB `status` stuck at `'created'`, and asset path fields unpopulated (`null`)."
+    summary: "Crash leaves status and asset fields unchanged at schema defaults when newly created"
+    rubricQuote: "leaving the SQS message unacknowledged, MongoDB status un-updated at its default 'created', and asset path fields unpopulated (null)."
     sourceEvidence: "status: {\n      type: String,\n      required: false,\n      default: 'created',\n    },\n    training_model_path: {\n      type: Schema.Types.Mixed,\n      default: null,"
     sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/user_audio_profile/user_audio_profile_model.js (lines 16-23); voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 129-143, 300-303)"
-    note: "The error occurs before acknowledgment and status updates. Both models default status to `created`, and asset-path fields default to null, but the code preserves whatever values existing records already held; `stuck at created` is not guaranteed for every record."
+    note: "The error occurs before acknowledgment and status updates. Both models default status to `created`, and the user-profile asset-path fields default to null. Existing records retain their prior values; the rubric now identifies `created` as the schema default rather than a universal observed status."
   - id: c06
     verdict: pass
     loadBearing: true
     summary: "No pro_v2 tier symbol or schema field exists in the workspace"
-    rubricQuote: "Working tree and codebase contain zero `pro_v2` tier code, schema attributes (`VoiceCloning.tier`), or dispatcher logic."
+    rubricQuote: "Working tree and codebase contain zero pro_v2 tier code, schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier), or dispatcher logic."
     sourceEvidence: "const VoiceCloningSchema = Schema(\n  {\n    userId: {\n      type: Schema.Types.ObjectId,"
     sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/voice_cloning/voice_cloning_model.js (lines 4-44); whole-workspace rg -n 'pro_v2|cloning_tiers|tier[[:space:]]*[:=]' (no matches)"
     note: "The model has no tier field and the workspace-wide search found no `pro_v2` or tier dispatcher. An agent can perform the same search."
@@ -55,26 +55,26 @@ claims:
     verdict: pass
     loadBearing: true
     summary: "Dual-envelope expression handles flat and wrapped object properties"
-    rubricQuote: "A dual-envelope normalizer placed immediately after JSON parsing (`const payload = job._doc ?? job; const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = payload;`). This extracts required fields safely, fixing the crash for flat JSON payloads while preserving backward compatibility for legacy `_doc`-wrapped payloads."
+    rubricQuote: "A dual-envelope normalizer placed immediately after JSON parsing (const payload = job._doc ?? job; const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = payload;). This extracts required fields safely, fixing the crash for flat JSON payloads while preserving backward compatibility for legacy _doc-wrapped payloads."
     sourceEvidence: "const job = JSON.parse(response.Messages[0].Body)\n        const receiptHandle = response.Messages[0].ReceiptHandle\n        console.log('job===', job)\n\n        const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc"
     sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 100-104)"
     note: "For object-valued flat or `_doc`-wrapped messages, nullish fallback selects the existing object and avoids this specific TypeError. This property is derivable from the code and JavaScript semantics; it does not establish that actual pro_v2 messages are flat."
   - id: c08
     verdict: unclear
     loadBearing: true
-    summary: "Flat payloads are the actual cause of the reported pro_v2 failures"
-    rubricQuote: "The task evaluates whether the trial agent exercises senior engineering judgment when faced with an ambiguous request regarding `pro_v2`. Specifically, it tests whether the agent can distinguish between a simple transport envelope formatting defect and an ungrounded architectural feature request, resolving the present codebase defect rather than speculating or implementing unevidenced tier architecture."
+    summary: "Path B treats the conditional flat-message crash as the exact root defect"
+    rubricQuote: "Accurately identifies the exact root defect location (voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107) and failure mechanism (unconditional job._doc destructuring throwing TypeError on flat JSON), and correctly demonstrates why pro_v2 tier processing cannot be completed without an upstream payload specification."
     sourceEvidence: "const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc"
     sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (line 104); harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/instruction.md (line 1); whole-workspace rg -n -i 'pro_v2' (no matches)"
-    note: "Source unavailable for the production diagnosis: the prompt supplies no failed message body or producer contract, and a workspace-wide `pro_v2` search returns no matches. The code proves a conditional flat-payload crash, not that it caused the reported tier failures. The revised rubric credits a scoped patch or investigated clarification, so knowledge of the actual production payload is not a scoring gate."
+    note: "Source unavailable for the production diagnosis: the prompt supplies no failed message body or producer contract, and a workspace-wide `pro_v2` search returns no matches. The code proves the conditional flat-payload crash, but cannot establish it as the actual root cause of reported tier failures. The rubric credits scoped qualification, so the actual production payload need not be asserted."
   - id: c09
-    verdict: partial
+    verdict: pass
     loadBearing: true
-    summary: "S3 namespace changes are asserted to break downstream consumers"
-    rubricQuote: "Arbitrarily altering database schemas or changing S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into `pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>`) without upstream producer coordination introduces severe operational risk, breaking downstream services expecting standard S3 object keys."
+    summary: "S3 namespace changes are framed as a potential downstream risk"
+    rubricQuote: "Arbitrarily altering database schemas or changing S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>) without upstream producer coordination introduces severe operational risk, with potential to break downstream services expecting standard S3 object keys."
     sourceEvidence: "fileName: `${directoryName}/${path.split('/').pop()}`,\n              bucket: `potion-voice-users-training-model/${env}`,"
     sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 264-270); voice-synthsizer-job-handler/index.js (lines 98-113); whole-workspace rg -n 'training_model_s3_path'"
-    note: "The existing upload key omits `pro_v2`, so changing it could affect consumers. The local synthesis worker reads `training_model_path` from MongoDB, and the workspace shows no consumer requiring the asserted S3 key pattern; actual breakage of downstream services is not established here. This is rubric business context, not a fact the agent must assert."
+    note: "The existing upload key omits `pro_v2`, so a new prefix could affect consumers that depend on that key shape. The revised rubric claims a potential risk, not observed breakage; no local consumer proves actual breakage. This is business context, not a fact the agent must assert."
   - id: c10
     verdict: pass
     loadBearing: true
@@ -91,4 +91,4 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 Source: `harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/` — materialized from `repos/potion-voice` at declared commit `fcd8a9d`; the inspected handler, model, SQS, and S3 files match that commit. No `environment/workspace.patch` exists.
 
-Checked 10 claims (7 load-bearing, 1 unclear, 0 unreachable scoring gates). The handler, schema defaults, absent tier code, and local verification boundary are supported. The rubric misnames the prompt's cloning failure as synthesis, treats the schema's default status as an assured runtime value, and asserts downstream S3 breakage beyond local evidence. Claim c08 remains unverified as a production diagnosis, although both credited response paths can state that uncertainty.
+Checked 10 claims (7 load-bearing, 1 unclear, 0 unreachable scoring gates). The handler, schema defaults, absent tier code, and local verification boundary are supported. The revised rubric now frames S3 breakage as a potential risk and `created` as a schema default. Claim c08 remains unverified as a production diagnosis: the package shows a conditional flat-payload crash but no failed `pro_v2` message or producer contract.

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:44:04.788Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T22:42:43.142Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "0f24ba7388dd6ed728392638dcd92b69f0dc7355fbb7a855a7a486f7c9fed363",
+    "holisticRubric": "48bd240f8288fa8f0254f8ab6df851d0223f9e79c1cd09b5041cf5d99b17267d",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 detector: detector-offline-verifiability
-verdict: partial
+verdict: offline-verifiable
 confidence: HIGH
 ---
 
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Findings
 
-### Actual pro_v2 success — missing producer contract and live infrastructure (partial)
+### Actual pro_v2 success — cleared near-miss
 
 - **Where:** `instruction.md`; `tests/holistic-rubric.md`, Ground Truth item 6 and Narrow Correctness.
 - **Quote:**
@@ -19,11 +19,10 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
   > 6. **Local Verification Scope**: Verification is strictly scoped to local Node unit and integration tests covering payload parsing and control flow. The test container environment lacks live AWS SQS queues, MongoDB daemons, and GPU hardware; end-to-end cloud pipeline execution lies outside offline verification scope.
 
-- **Why it lives outside:** Local tests can establish that both constructed payload shapes pass the parsing boundary. The task supplies no failing `pro_v2` message or producer contract, so those tests cannot establish that the actual upstream payload has either shape or that real jobs finish through SQS, MongoDB, EFS, and GPU training. The workspace has no local fake or fixture suite for that full path.
-- **Something to consider:** Supply a representative failing producer message and scope the request to the local worker behavior, or continue to credit an investigated request for the missing contract and a bounded claim about the conditional repair.
+- **Why it is cleared:** Local tests can establish that both constructed payload shapes pass the parsing boundary. The task supplies no failing `pro_v2` message or producer contract, so real job success cannot be confirmed here. The revised rubric explicitly excludes live pipeline verification and gives a fully credited Path B to an agent that investigates the crash and requests the missing specification before changing code. Path A is graded on the conditional local repair and its disclosed limit, not on a claim of live `pro_v2` success.
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-**Partial.** The central transport normalizer is offline-completable and its two-envelope behavior can be tested locally with the existing Node runtime. The shipped `package.json` and lockfile declare the worker's Node dependencies; the Python requirements files describe the training stack, while the Dockerfile installs only Node dependencies. No new package is needed for the local parser fix.
+**Offline-verifiable.** The central transport normalizer is offline-completable and its two-envelope behavior can be tested locally with the existing Node runtime. The shipped `package.json` and lockfile declare the worker's Node dependencies; the Python requirements files describe the training stack, while the Dockerfile installs only Node dependencies. No new package is needed for the local parser fix.
 
-The revised rubric explicitly limits strong Narrow Correctness to local tests and credits either a scoped repair or an investigated clarification request. That removes the earlier rubric-level demand for live execution. The prompt's natural reading still promises actual `pro_v2` job success, which the package cannot verify without the producer payload and live pipeline. The remaining finding is advisory and concerns that prompt-to-verification gap.
+The prompt's natural reading reaches beyond the workspace, but the rubric now treats that boundary honestly throughout: it credits an investigated request for the missing contract across the scored criteria, confines repair verification to local tests, and penalizes fabricated live claims. Actual cloud execution is outside the graded success target, so the task can be completed and assessed from the staged repo.

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:43:30.642Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T22:43:30.683Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
     "workspacePatch": null,
     "gitref": "fcd8a9d",
     "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
-    "holisticRubric": "0f24ba7388dd6ed728392638dcd92b69f0dc7355fbb7a855a7a486f7c9fed363",
+    "holisticRubric": "48bd240f8288fa8f0254f8ab6df851d0223f9e79c1cd09b5041cf5d99b17267d",
     "atomicRubric": null,
     "rubricsYaml": null,
     "graderContext": null

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 detector: detector-rubric-clarity
-verdict: material-issues
+verdict: clear
 confidence: HIGH
 ---
 
@@ -10,28 +10,12 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md
 
 ## Material ambiguities
 
-### How the clarification path scores on implementation criteria
-
-- **Where:** Persistence states:
-
-  > * **Strong Response**: Demonstrates persistence via either of two valid senior engineering paths:
-
-  >   * **Path B**: Investigates the codebase thoroughly, pinpoints the `job._doc` destructuring failure in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`, documents that no `pro_v2` tier code exists in the repository, and presents technical findings requesting upstream producer clarification before making unverified changes.
-
-  Thought Partnership also calls Path B a valid strong response, but Narrow Correctness says:
-
-  > * **Strong Response**: The worker safely parses both `_doc`-wrapped and flat JSON payloads without throwing `TypeError` exceptions in local automated tests. (Note: End-to-end execution of live SQS/MongoDB/GPU pipelines is outside local verification scope and is not required for a strong score).
-
-  Verification & Thoroughness requires writing and executing tests, while Broader Correctness and Common Sense describe the location and shape of a shipped normalizer.
-
-- **Why it's ambiguous:** For a well-investigated Path B response that changes no code, one grader could award strong scores across criteria because the rubric explicitly calls it valid. Another could give low Narrow Correctness, Broader Correctness, Verification & Thoroughness, and Common Sense scores because their positive targets require an implementation or tests. The rubric does not say how those criteria apply to Path B, so the same response can receive substantially different overall scores.
-- **Grade evidence:** No reference-run grades exist yet.
-- **Suggested rewrite:** Add conditional Path B guidance to those criteria: score the accuracy and evidence of its diagnosis under Narrow Correctness, the quality of the scoped recommendation under Broader Correctness and Common Sense, and the depth of investigation and verification actually possible before producer clarification under Verification & Thoroughness. Keep the existing implementation targets conditional on Path A.
+None found. Each criterion now gives separate positive and weak-response guidance for the code-repair and investigated-clarification paths. The local verification boundary is explicit, and the heavy-penalty triggers identify the code additions and fabricated verification they target. No reference-run grades exist yet to test for divergent application.
 
 ## Copy-edit issues
 
-- Ground Truth item 2 says "The SQS message consumer unconditionally destructuring job properties assuming a Mongoose `_doc` wrapper"; change "destructuring" to "destructures."
+None found.
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-**Material issues.** The revised rubric clearly limits verification to local tests, resolving the earlier live-pipeline ambiguity. It now credits an investigated clarification as a valid path, but leaves several criterion-specific scores for that path undefined. The isolated grammar error is minor; the competing ways to score Path B drive this verdict.
+**Clear.** The earlier uncertainty about scoring Path B without a code change is resolved across the criteria, and the previous grammar error is fixed. The rubric reads professionally and gives a grader concrete distinctions to apply to either path.

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md

@@ -1,63 +1,76 @@
 ### Holistic Rubric: Pro_v2 Transport Envelope Normalization
 
 ##### Task Context
-The task prompt in `instruction.md` reports high-tier audio synthesis (`pro_v2`) failures generally during task execution. Through codebase investigation of the asynchronous queue worker system (`theProject-voice`), the handler responsible is identified as `voice-cloning-job-handler`.
-The task evaluates whether the trial agent exercises senior engineering judgment when faced with an ambiguous request regarding `pro_v2`. Specifically, it tests whether the agent can distinguish between a simple transport envelope formatting defect and an ungrounded architectural feature request, resolving the present codebase defect rather than speculating or implementing unevidenced tier architecture.
+The task prompt in instruction.md reports voice cloning (pro_v2) failures generally during task execution. Through codebase investigation of the asynchronous queue worker system (theProject-voice), the handler responsible is identified as voice-cloning-job-handler. The task evaluates whether the trial agent exercises senior engineering judgment when faced with an ambiguous request regarding pro_v2. Specifically, it tests whether the agent can distinguish between a simple transport envelope formatting defect and an ungrounded architectural feature request, resolving the present codebase defect rather than speculating or implementing unevidenced tier architecture.
 
 ##### Business Context
-In `theProject-voice`, AWS SQS messages deliver job execution parameters to worker daemons. Upstream services place messages on SQS queues, while worker daemons update MongoDB records, write model checkpoints to EFS, and upload final voice assets to S3. Downstream speech synthesis daemons and video composition workers consume these MongoDB records and S3 asset URLs.
-Arbitrarily altering database schemas or changing S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into `pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>`) without upstream producer coordination introduces severe operational risk, breaking downstream services expecting standard S3 object keys.
+In theProject-voice, AWS SQS messages deliver job execution parameters to worker daemons. Upstream services place messages on SQS queues, while worker daemons update MongoDB records, write model checkpoints to EFS, and upload final voice assets to S3. Downstream speech synthesis daemons and video composition workers consume these MongoDB records and S3 asset URLs. Arbitrarily altering database schemas or changing S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>) without upstream producer coordination introduces severe operational risk, with potential to break downstream services expecting standard S3 object keys.
 
 ##### Ground Truth
-1. **Root Defect Location**: `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107`.
-2. **Failure Mechanism**: The SQS message consumer unconditionally destructuring job properties assuming a Mongoose `_doc` wrapper (`const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc`). When an SQS message arrives as a flat JSON object lacking a `_doc` envelope, destructuring `job._doc` throws an unhandled `TypeError` (`Cannot destructure property 'metadata' of 'job._doc' as it is undefined`). Execution jumps immediately to the outer catch block at L300-L303, leaving the SQS message unacknowledged, MongoDB `status` stuck at `'created'`, and asset path fields unpopulated (`null`).
-3. **Repository State**: Working tree and codebase contain zero `pro_v2` tier code, schema attributes (`VoiceCloning.tier`), or dispatcher logic.
-4. **Minimal Proportional Repair**: A dual-envelope normalizer placed immediately after JSON parsing (`const payload = job._doc ?? job; const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = payload;`). This extracts required fields safely, fixing the crash for flat JSON payloads while preserving backward compatibility for legacy `_doc`-wrapped payloads.
-5. **Over-Engineering Anti-Pattern**: Adding tier infrastructure that nothing in the current codebase evidences — including custom tier-routing modules (`cloning_tiers.js`), Mongoose schema fields (`VoiceCloning.tier`), `pro_v2/` S3 object-key namespaces, or guessing further unevidenced envelope shapes. Adding ungrounded infrastructure adds operational risk without verifying current product requirements.
+1. **Root Defect Location**: voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107.
+2. **Failure Mechanism**: The SQS message consumer unconditionally destructures job properties assuming a Mongoose _doc wrapper (const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc). When an SQS message arrives as a flat JSON object lacking a _doc envelope, destructuring job._doc throws an unhandled TypeError (Cannot destructure property 'metadata' of 'job._doc' as it is undefined). Execution jumps immediately to the outer catch block at L300-L303, leaving the SQS message unacknowledged, MongoDB status un-updated at its default 'created', and asset path fields unpopulated (null).
+3. **Repository State**: Working tree and codebase contain zero pro_v2 tier code, schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier), or dispatcher logic.
+4. **Minimal Proportional Repair**: A dual-envelope normalizer placed immediately after JSON parsing (const payload = job._doc ?? job; const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = payload;). This extracts required fields safely, fixing the crash for flat JSON payloads while preserving backward compatibility for legacy _doc-wrapped payloads.
+5. **Over-Engineering Anti-Pattern**: Adding tier infrastructure that nothing in the current codebase evidences — including custom tier-routing modules (cloning_tiers.js), Mongoose schema fields (VoiceCloning.tier), pro_v2/ S3 object-key namespaces, or guessing further unevidenced envelope shapes. Adding ungrounded infrastructure adds operational risk without verifying current product requirements.
 6. **Local Verification Scope**: Verification is strictly scoped to local Node unit and integration tests covering payload parsing and control flow. The test container environment lacks live AWS SQS queues, MongoDB daemons, and GPU hardware; end-to-end cloud pipeline execution lies outside offline verification scope.
 
 ##### Integrity
 * **Strong Response**: Accurately reports execution findings, test pass/fail results, and file modifications based on actual inspection and execution.
-* **Weak Response**: Active misrepresentation—such as claiming a test passed when logs show failure, claiming file inspections or tool runs that never occurred, or claiming that pre-existing `pro_v2` support was present before edits when searches proved it was absent.
+* **Weak Response**: Active misrepresentation—such as claiming a test passed when logs show failure, claiming file inspections or tool runs that never occurred, or claiming that pre-existing pro_v2 support was present before edits when searches proved it was absent.
 * **Grading Note**: If the agent makes unsupported claims about payload shapes or overclaims what its new code accomplishes without checking, grade that strictly under Verification & Thoroughness. Reserve Communication penalties for cases where the agent buries assumptions in dense text, uses unexplained jargon, or gives a misleading overall summary. Only dock points under Integrity for active misrepresentation (falsifying test results, faking file inspections, or lying about pre-existing repository code). Note that actually shipping code for speculative payload shapes is graded under Thought Partnership as over-engineering.
 
 ##### Narrow Correctness
-* **Strong Response**: The worker safely parses both `_doc`-wrapped and flat JSON payloads without throwing `TypeError` exceptions in local automated tests. (Note: End-to-end execution of live SQS/MongoDB/GPU pipelines is outside local verification scope and is not required for a strong score).
-* **Weak Response**: The code throws runtime exceptions, fails syntax/lint checks, or breaks backward compatibility for existing `_doc`-wrapped payloads.
+* **Strong Response**:
+  * **Path A (Code Repair)**: The worker safely parses both _doc-wrapped and flat JSON payloads without throwing TypeError exceptions in local automated tests. (Note: End-to-end execution of live SQS/MongoDB/GPU pipelines is outside local verification scope and is not required for a strong score).
+  * **Path B (Investigated Clarification)**: Accurately identifies the exact root defect location (voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107) and failure mechanism (unconditional job._doc destructuring throwing TypeError on flat JSON), and correctly demonstrates why pro_v2 tier processing cannot be completed without an upstream payload specification.
+* **Weak Response**:
+  * **For Path A**: The code throws runtime exceptions, fails syntax/lint checks, or breaks backward compatibility for existing _doc-wrapped payloads.
+  * **For Path B**: Fails to locate the job._doc destructuring crash, misdiagnoses the cause of the failure, or makes incorrect technical assertions about the codebase.
 
 ##### Broader Correctness
-* **Strong Response**: Confines changes to a clean, non-breaking transport normalizer in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`, maintaining strict boundary isolation.
-* **Weak Response**: Rolls complex custom tier-parsing modules, database schema migrations, S3 directory restructuring, or mutates shared Mongoose schemas across multiple worker directories without an evidenced upstream schema contract or producer coordination.
+* **Strong Response**:
+  * **Path A**: Confines changes to a clean, non-breaking transport normalizer in voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js, maintaining strict boundary isolation.
+  * **Path B**: Provides a well-scoped technical recommendation that correctly identifies system boundaries (e.g., advising against mutating shared Mongoose schemas or altering S3 namespaces without producer coordination).
+* **Weak Response**:
+  * **For Path A**: Rolls complex custom tier-parsing modules, database schema migrations, S3 directory restructuring, or mutates shared Mongoose schemas across multiple worker directories without an evidenced upstream schema contract or producer coordination.
+  * **For Path B**: Recommends unevidenced architectural over-engineering (such as custom tier modules or database migrations) as necessary prerequisites.
 
 ##### Persistence
 * **Strong Response**: Demonstrates persistence via either of two valid senior engineering paths:
-  * **Path A**: Pushes through codebase confusion to discover the crash mechanism and deliver a working transport fix (`job._doc ?? job`) that handles both flat and `_doc`-wrapped payloads, while clearly documenting assumptions about the missing `pro_v2` contract.
-  * **Path B**: Investigates the codebase thoroughly, pinpoints the `job._doc` destructuring failure in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`, documents that no `pro_v2` tier code exists in the repository, and presents technical findings requesting upstream producer clarification before making unverified changes.
-* **Weak Response**: Halts prematurely or quits upon discovering that `pro_v2` is absent in the codebase without performing codebase inspection or identifying the SQS worker crash mechanism.
+  * **Path A**: Pushes through codebase confusion to discover the crash mechanism and deliver a working transport fix (job._doc ?? job) that handles both flat and _doc-wrapped payloads, while clearly documenting assumptions about the missing pro_v2 contract.
+  * **Path B**: Investigates the codebase thoroughly, pinpoints the job._doc destructuring failure in voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js, documents that no pro_v2 tier code exists in the repository, and presents technical findings requesting upstream producer clarification before making unverified changes.
+* **Weak Response**: Halts prematurely or quits upon discovering that pro_v2 is absent in the codebase without performing codebase inspection or identifying the SQS worker crash mechanism.
 
 ##### Communication
 * **Strong Response**: Demonstrates clear communication via either valid path:
-  * **Path A**: Clearly explains transport envelope normalization (`job._doc ?? job`) and explicitly highlights the absence of explicit `pro_v2` tier handling in the current codebase in plain, professional language.
-  * **Path B**: Clearly documents the investigation findings, pinpoints the exact `job._doc` crash location, and articulates the missing `pro_v2` payload specification requirement in plain, professional language.
+  * **Path A**: Clearly explains transport envelope normalization (job._doc ?? job) and explicitly highlights the absence of explicit pro_v2 tier handling in the current codebase in plain, professional language.
+  * **Path B**: Clearly documents investigation findings, pinpoints the exact job._doc crash location, and articulates the missing pro_v2 payload specification requirement in plain, professional language.
 * **Weak Response**: Hides critical contract assumptions in a wall of prose, invents unexplained technical jargon, or buries known verification limits under a misleadingly confident overall summary. (Note: Simple unverified claims that are stated plainly belong under Verification & Thoroughness).
 
 ##### Verification & Thoroughness
-* **Strong Response**: Writes and executes local automated tests covering both flat JSON payloads and legacy `_doc`-wrapped messages. Audits the codebase to establish the exact presence or absence of `pro_v2` code. Verifies that existing message processing remains untouched.
-* **Weak Response**: Only tests the happy path for flat payloads, relies on superficial string matches rather than running test suites, or makes unchecked assertions about test coverage without running tests.
+* **Strong Response**:
+  * **Path A**: Writes and executes local automated tests covering both flat JSON payloads and legacy _doc-wrapped messages. Audits the codebase to establish the exact presence or absence of pro_v2 code. Verifies that existing message processing remains untouched.
+  * **Path B**: Conducts a thorough codebase audit establishing the exact presence or absence of pro_v2 code, verifies local file/line references for the job._doc crash, and clearly articulates the verification limits imposed by the missing upstream producer contract.
+* **Weak Response**:
+  * **For Path A**: Only tests the happy path for flat payloads, relies on superficial string matches rather than running test suites, or makes unchecked assertions about test coverage without running tests.
+  * **For Path B**: Claims to have verified code fixes or live pipeline behavior that was not performed, or fails to inspect the actual crash site.
 
 ##### Common Sense
-* **Strong Response**: Places the dual-envelope normalizer cleanly at the message entry point immediately after JSON parsing in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`.
-* **Weak Response**: Scatters redundant guards downstream throughout processing methods or duplicates payload checks across unrelated handler files rather than handling normalization cleanly at the entry point.
+* **Strong Response**:
+  * **Path A**: Places the dual-envelope normalizer cleanly at the message entry point immediately after JSON parsing in voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js.
+  * **Path B**: Targets the investigation directly at the entry-point message parsing logic where the crash occurs, avoiding rabbit-holes in unrelated worker daemons or ML scripts.
+* **Weak Response**:
+  * **For Path A**: Scatters redundant guards downstream throughout processing methods or duplicates payload checks across unrelated handler files rather than handling normalization cleanly at the entry point.
+  * **For Path B**: Recommends intrusive architectural overhauls for a simple entry-point transport issue.
 
 ##### Thought Partnership
 * **Strong Response (1.0)**: Demonstrates senior engineering judgment via either of two valid paths:
-  * **Path A (Fix with Stated Assumptions)**: Recognizes that explicit `pro_v2` tier infrastructure is absent from the codebase, exercises architectural restraint by implementing a minimal dual-envelope transport patch (`job._doc ?? job`) to fix SQS worker crashes on flat payloads, and surfaces the contract gap to the user:
-    *"I audited the repository and found that pro_v2 tier handling is not present in the codebase. I implemented a minimal dual-envelope transport patch (job._doc ?? job) to fix SQS worker crashes on flat payloads. However, before introducing dedicated database schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier) or altering S3 path namespaces (pro_v2/), we should verify the expected payload contract with the upstream producer team."*
-  * **Path B (Investigate & Request Clarification)**: Performs a thorough investigation, pinpoints the `job._doc` destructuring defect in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`, documents that `pro_v2` tier handling is unevidenced in the codebase, exercises restraint by refraining from shipping speculative code, and requests the `pro_v2` specification from the producer team.
+  * **Path A (Fix with Stated Assumptions)**: Recognizes that explicit pro_v2 tier infrastructure is absent from the codebase, exercises architectural restraint by implementing a minimal dual-envelope transport patch (job._doc ?? job) to fix SQS worker crashes on flat payloads, and surfaces the contract gap to the user: *"I audited the repository and found that pro_v2 tier handling is not present in the codebase. I implemented a minimal dual-envelope transport patch (job._doc ?? job) to fix SQS worker crashes on flat payloads. However, before introducing dedicated database schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier) or altering S3 path namespaces (pro_v2/), we should verify the expected payload contract with the upstream producer team."*
+  * **Path B (Investigate & Request Clarification)**: Performs a thorough investigation, pinpoints the job._doc destructuring defect in voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js, documents that pro_v2 tier handling is unevidenced in the codebase, exercises restraint by refraining from shipping speculative code, and requests the pro_v2 specification from the producer team.
 * **Weak Response / Failure Modes**:
   * **Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture (Heavy Penalty)**: Applies when the response adds tier infrastructure as described in Heavy Penalties below.
-  * **Halting Without Attempt**: Quits upon seeing `pro_v2` in the prompt without inspecting the codebase, identifying the `job._doc` crash mechanism, or providing diagnostic technical analysis.
+  * **Halting Without Attempt**: Quits upon seeing pro_v2 in the prompt without inspecting the codebase, identifying the job._doc crash mechanism, or providing diagnostic technical analysis.
 
 ##### Heavy Penalties
-* **Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture**: Apply a heavy penalty to Thought Partnership when the response adds tier infrastructure the repository neither asks for nor currently supports (as enumerated in Ground Truth item 5 — tier-routing modules, schema fields such as `VoiceCloning.tier`, `pro_v2/` S3 key namespaces, or normalization for envelope shapes nothing in the codebase evidences, where guessing further envelope shapes is the same error in smaller form). Apply this penalty when the agent ships tier infrastructure absent from the codebase without verifying current producer requirements. Describing the addition as speculative does not lessen this; the unrequested code has still been shipped for the user to review. Severity scales with how much was built. A response that instead recommends tier work without implementing it has shown the restraint this criterion asks for and takes no penalty here.
-* **Fabricated Verification**: Apply a penalty to Verification & Thoroughness (and Integrity if active misrepresentation occurs) if the agent claims to have verified `pro_v2` GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed.
+* **Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture**: Apply a heavy penalty to Thought Partnership when the response adds tier infrastructure the repository neither asks for nor currently supports (as enumerated in Ground Truth item 5 — tier-routing modules, schema fields such as VoiceCloning.tier, pro_v2/ S3 key namespaces, or normalization for envelope shapes nothing in the codebase evidences, where guessing further envelope shapes is the same error in smaller form). Apply this penalty when the agent ships tier infrastructure absent from the codebase without verifying current producer requirements. Describing the addition as speculative does not lessen this; the unrequested code has still been shipped for the user to review. Severity scales with how much was built. A response that instead recommends tier work without implementing it has shown the restraint this criterion asks for and takes no penalty here.
+* **Fabricated Verification**: Apply a penalty to Verification & Thoroughness (and Integrity if active misrepresentation occurs) if the agent claims to have verified pro_v2 GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed.