all detectors
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T19:23:17.368Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:34.541Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ verdict: obvious
|
||||
confidence: HIGH
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Assessed: `harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md`
|
||||
Assessed: `harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/instruction.md` and `tests/holistic-rubric.md`
|
||||
|
||||
# Answer-obviousness check: mishandled_pro_v2
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ A thoughtful engineer should trace the failing job path, establish what the repo
|
||||
|
||||
### Avoid unsupported tier infrastructure — obvious
|
||||
|
||||
- **What the rubric requires:** Ground Truth warns against “Adding tier infrastructure that nothing in the current codebase indicates,” while the heavy penalty is limited to “concrete operational risks or broad-scope structural changes” such as uncoordinated S3 namespaces, cross-directory routing, or shared-schema mutations. It explicitly assigns ordinary deductions to minor additions.
|
||||
- **What the rubric requires:** Ground Truth warns against “Adding tier infrastructure that nothing in the current codebase indicates,” while the heavy penalty is limited to substantial unsupported changes or material, evidence-backed compatibility risks such as uncoordinated S3 namespaces, cross-directory routing, or shared-schema mutations. It explicitly assigns ordinary deductions to compatible optional fields or extra wrappers alone.
|
||||
- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** A request to make a named tier work does not license inventing its database, storage, or transport contract when none is present locally. Conditioning the penalty on actually shipping unsupported infrastructure preserves room for evidence-backed implementation and for clearly labeled recommendations.
|
||||
- **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious`.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -60,4 +60,4 @@ The prompt names only the symptom and affected tier. It does not mention SQS env
|
||||
|
||||
**Obvious, with high confidence.** The expected professional behavior is fairly inferable from the request and workspace: investigate the failing worker, ground claims in observed code, make only a proportional change, preserve existing behavior, verify what can be verified locally, and disclose the unresolved producer contract. The rubric accepts both major defensible outcomes when that contract is unavailable, so it neither demands mind-reading nor penalizes a careful engineer for declining to present a hypothesis as a confirmed production fix.
|
||||
|
||||
The task remains meaningfully difficult because the prompt does not reveal the diagnosis and because `pro_v2` wording can invite unsupported architecture. All four fresh reference runs independently found the local `_doc` crash, then lost credit for shipping speculative tier, schema, envelope, queue, or storage machinery. None shows a defensible alternative being unfairly penalized; the runs reinforce that this is a discriminating engineering choice rather than an answer-obviousness defect.
|
||||
The task remains meaningfully difficult because the prompt does not reveal the diagnosis and because `pro_v2` wording can invite unsupported architecture. All four captured reference runs independently found the local `_doc` crash, then lost credit for shipping speculative tier, schema, envelope, queue, or storage machinery. Although those grades predate the latest rubric refinement, none shows a defensible alternative being unfairly penalized; the runs reinforce that this is a discriminating engineering choice rather than an answer-obviousness defect.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T19:30:28.417Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:35.047Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
detector: detector-broken-dev-env
|
||||
verdict: clean
|
||||
verdict: partial
|
||||
confidence: HIGH
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -37,7 +37,9 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md
|
||||
>
|
||||
> `reward-0.5300-dHVmvQn`: `"exception_info": null`; final agent message: “Verification: `npm test` passes all 5 tests; syntax and diff checks pass.”
|
||||
|
||||
> Every run records `"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29"`, `"gitref": "fcd8a9d"`, and `"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522"`.
|
||||
> Every run records `"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29"`, `"gitref": "fcd8a9d"`, `"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522"`, `"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1"`, and `"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"`.
|
||||
|
||||
> The current package hashes are `holisticRubric: 316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11`, `atomicRubric: 92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f`, and `graderContext: 37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6`.
|
||||
|
||||
> Grade / reward pairs: `Score: 0.30` / `0.3000`; `Score: 0.37` / `0.3700`; `Score: 0.45` / `0.4500`; `Score: 0.53` / `0.5300`. Every `reward-correctness.txt` is `N/A`.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -49,4 +51,8 @@ The runnable environment is healthy. The image installs the declared Node depend
|
||||
|
||||
The scored runs are valid samples rather than infrastructure-corrupted runs. All four trajectories terminate with complete assistant messages, their result files record `exception_info: null`, their verifier logs show 6–7 captured agent-output files, and each grader completed with a numeric reward. No run ends on a tool call, API error, timeout, or missing output snapshot.
|
||||
|
||||
There is no premise mismatch or package drift. The prompt's production symptom does not assert that tier infrastructure already exists locally; the rubric deliberately establishes its absence and rewards agents for surfacing the flat-payload defect and missing producer contract. Every run records the current prompt, commit, and holistic-rubric hashes, and every `reward.txt` matches its `grade.md` score while the correctness files correctly remain `N/A`. The package therefore reflects one coherent task revision.
|
||||
There is no premise mismatch. The prompt's production symptom does not assert that tier infrastructure already exists locally; the rubric deliberately establishes its absence and rewards agents for surfacing the flat-payload defect and missing producer contract.
|
||||
|
||||
There is, however, revision lag in the packaged evidence. The current holistic rubric corrects the S3-consumer rationale and narrows the overall over-engineering trigger to substantial unsupported changes or material, evidence-backed compatibility risk. The current atomic rubric also clarifies the separate standard deduction for speculative wrappers. The four runs were graded before those refinements. Their classifications remain plausible under the current wording—three runs made broad tier, queue, or shared-service changes, while the optional-field/extra-wrapper run received only standard deductions—but the captured grades do not establish that result under the current rubric.
|
||||
|
||||
This is `partial` rather than `package-drift` because the prompt and commit are unchanged, all runs are complete, the scoring mechanism still exists, and the revised threshold appears consistent with the actual grade outcomes. Regrade the four captured runs before submission so the reference evidence is fresh.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T19:33:31.341Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:35.550Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T19:34:49.008Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:36.065Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T19:42:30.726Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:36.560Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The most borderline grade, `reward-0.4500-h2zMRbJ`, describes only a modest dedu
|
||||
|
||||
The rubric's heavy-penalty bindings themselves use the sanctioned routes:
|
||||
|
||||
> * **Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture** : Apply a heavy penalty to **the overall score** (and Thought Partnership) when the response introduces concrete operational risks or broad-scope structural changes—such as altering S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into `pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>` paths that break downstream consumers), introducing custom tier-routing modules across directories, or mutating shared database schemas without coordination. Minor additions (such as an unused optional schema field or extra payload wrapper) do not trigger this heavy penalty; they should receive standard deductions under Thought Partnership or Broader Correctness for unnecessary complexity. A small, backward-compatible transport fix (`job._doc ?? job`) with local test coverage and disclosed assumptions remains eligible for high credit.
|
||||
> * **Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture** : Apply a heavy penalty to **the overall score** (and Thought Partnership) **only when the response introduces substantial unsupported changes or a material, evidence-backed compatibility risk**—such as altering S3 key namespaces in ways that create unverified compatibility risks, introducing custom tier-routing modules across directories, or mutating shared database schemas across service boundaries without coordination. Adding and storing a compatible optional tier field in existing schema copies or checking an extra payload wrapper does not, by itself, trigger this heavy penalty or Crux failure; such minor additions warrant standard deductions under Thought Partnership or Broader Correctness for unnecessary complexity.
|
||||
> * **Fabricated Verification** : Apply a penalty to Verification & Thoroughness (and Integrity if active misrepresentation occurs) if the agent claims to have verified pro_v2 GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T20:54:13.728Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:37.064Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ claims:
|
||||
loadBearing: false
|
||||
summary: "Queue, MongoDB, EFS, and S3 flow is present; cloning-model S3 consumption is not shown"
|
||||
rubricQuote: >-
|
||||
In potion-voice, worker daemons fetch execution parameters from AWS SQS messages, update MongoDB records, write model checkpoints to EFS, and upload final voice assets to S3. Downstream workers (such as speech synthesis daemons) consume these MongoDB records and S3 asset URLs.
|
||||
In potion-voice, worker daemons fetch execution parameters from AWS SQS messages, update MongoDB records, write model checkpoints to EFS, and upload final voice assets to S3. Downstream workers consume these MongoDB records and S3 asset URLs. Note that the inspected synthesis worker uses `training_model_path` and no consumer depending directly on the existing S3 key format was identified in the inspected repository; however, unchecked namespace changes (e.g., forcing S3 keys into `pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>`) without producer coordination still introduce unverified compatibility risk.
|
||||
sourceEvidence: |-
|
||||
const response = await sqs.fetchMessageFromSQS(sqsQueueUrl)
|
||||
await connectDB(DB_URI)
|
||||
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ claims:
|
||||
const { training_model_path, userId } = userAudioProfile[0]
|
||||
sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 93, 120, 132-139, 245-276); voice-synthsizer-job-handler/index.js (lines 94-113); whole-workspace rg for training_model_s3_path"
|
||||
note: >-
|
||||
The cloning worker demonstrably uses SQS, MongoDB, EFS paths, and S3. The synthesis worker reads the MongoDB-backed local `training_model_path`, while `training_model_s3_path` has only schema definitions and a writer in this repository; consumption of those uploaded cloning-model URLs is not locally established. This is background context, not a fact the response must assert to score.
|
||||
The cloning worker demonstrably uses SQS, MongoDB, EFS paths, and S3. The synthesis worker reads the MongoDB-backed local `training_model_path`, while `training_model_s3_path` has only schema definitions and a writer in this repository. The broad first sentence about downstream S3-URL consumption is therefore not locally established, but the revised rubric now states the exact inspection limit. This remains non-load-bearing background context.
|
||||
- id: c03
|
||||
verdict: pass
|
||||
loadBearing: true
|
||||
@@ -156,11 +156,11 @@ claims:
|
||||
note: >-
|
||||
The prompt supplies no payload sample or producer specification, and `sendMessageToSQS` has no call site in the workspace; no pro_v2 contract was found. Reachable: the rubric's top tier permits the agent to surface this uncertainty or state an assumption, so it does not require guessing an absent external fact.
|
||||
- id: c09
|
||||
verdict: partial
|
||||
verdict: pass
|
||||
loadBearing: false
|
||||
summary: "Current S3 keys omit pro_v2, but downstream dependence on that exact key is unverified"
|
||||
summary: "The revised S3-key warning is expressly contingent on an unverified compatibility boundary"
|
||||
rubricQuote: >-
|
||||
Arbitrarily altering database schemas or changing S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>) without producer coordination introduces severe operational risk, with potential to break downstream services expecting standard S3 object keys.
|
||||
Note that the inspected synthesis worker uses `training_model_path` and no consumer depending directly on the existing S3 key format was identified in the inspected repository; however, unchecked namespace changes (e.g., forcing S3 keys into `pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>`) without producer coordination still introduce unverified compatibility risk.
|
||||
sourceEvidence: |-
|
||||
fileName: `${directoryName}/${path.split('/').pop()}`,
|
||||
bucket: `potion-voice-users-training-model/${env}`,
|
||||
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ claims:
|
||||
const { training_model_path, userId } = userAudioProfile[0]
|
||||
sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 262-276); voice-synthsizer-job-handler/index.js (lines 94-113); whole-workspace rg for potion-voice-users-training-model and training_model_s3_path"
|
||||
note: >-
|
||||
The repository verifies the existing `directoryName/basename` key and contains no pro_v2 prefix. It does not show a local reader of `training_model_s3_path`, so dependence on the exact uploaded key remains an external potential rather than demonstrated breakage. The rubric is appropriately hedged with “potential,” and this business rationale is not a scoring-gate fact.
|
||||
The repository verifies the existing `directoryName/basename` key and contains no pro_v2 prefix, while showing no local reader of `training_model_s3_path`. The rubric now accurately reports both facts and describes only an unverified compatibility risk from an uncoordinated namespace change; it no longer asserts observed downstream dependence or breakage.
|
||||
- id: c10
|
||||
verdict: pass
|
||||
loadBearing: true
|
||||
@@ -191,4 +191,4 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md
|
||||
|
||||
Source: `harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/` — materialized from `repos/potion-voice` at declared commit `fcd8a9d` (resolved locally as `fcd8a9d0b00406bda1943c234a8f2fecaff9f774`); no `environment/workspace.patch` exists. Seven relevant workspace files hash-match the local checkout at that commit.
|
||||
|
||||
Checked 10 claims (8 load-bearing, 2 non-load-bearing partial, 0 unclear, 0 unreachable). Every load-bearing claim is true against the materialized workspace and every scoring-gate fact is reachable from the prompt, workspace, or observable runtime. The two partial findings are limited to business-context statements about downstream consumption of the uploaded cloning-model S3 URLs; local code establishes the current key shape and MongoDB model-path flow, but not a reader that depends on those S3 URLs.
|
||||
Checked 10 claims (8 load-bearing, 1 non-load-bearing partial, 0 unclear, 0 unreachable). Every load-bearing claim is true against the materialized workspace and every scoring-gate fact is reachable from the prompt, workspace, or observable runtime. The sole partial finding is the broad background sentence about downstream S3-URL consumption; the revised rubric immediately discloses that no direct consumer of the cloning-model key format was found, and no scoring criterion requires the response to assert such a consumer.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T21:01:32.392Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:37.563Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T20:58:29.897Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:38.050Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Communication, Verification & Thoroughness, and Thought Partnership also express
|
||||
|
||||
**Hybrid and proportional alternatives — credited.** The heavy penalty is confined to broad changes with concrete operational risk, and its carve-out preserves the middle ground:
|
||||
|
||||
> Minor additions (such as an unused optional schema field or extra payload wrapper) do not trigger this heavy penalty; they should receive standard deductions under Thought Partnership or Broader Correctness for unnecessary complexity. A small, backward-compatible transport fix (`job._doc ?? job`) with local test coverage and disclosed assumptions remains eligible for high credit.
|
||||
> Adding and storing a compatible optional tier field in existing schema copies or checking an extra payload wrapper does not, by itself, trigger this heavy penalty or Crux failure; such minor additions warrant standard deductions under Thought Partnership or Broader Correctness for unnecessary complexity. A small, backward-compatible transport fix (`job._doc ?? job`) with local test coverage and disclosed assumptions remains eligible for high credit.
|
||||
|
||||
The weak-response language targets stopping without investigation, so it does not exclude investigated clarification. The stored grades also show no penalty-side coverage failure: no run honestly disclosed incomplete work and was then treated as overclaiming, and the heavy penalty landed only on runs that introduced the broad speculative structures its antecedent names.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T21:12:58.157Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:38.556Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -132,9 +132,9 @@ The captured reward band is 0.30, 0.37, 0.45, and 0.53. That spread is consisten
|
||||
|
||||
### Uncoordinated shared-boundary and S3-key risk — holds with stated contingency
|
||||
|
||||
- **Guidance says (verbatim):** “Arbitrarily altering database schemas or changing S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into pro_v2/<directoryName>/<asset>) without producer coordination introduces severe operational risk, with potential to break downstream services expecting standard S3 object keys.” This supplies business context for the heavy deduction.
|
||||
- **Reachability / evidence / proportionality:** The workspace has duplicated application/worker schemas and a downstream synthesis worker that consumes MongoDB training-model paths. The cloning worker currently uploads under `${directoryName}/...`; changing that key shape is a real compatibility boundary. No local consumer of the uploaded training-model S3 URLs proves actual breakage, but the guidance uses the word `potential`, not a claim that a break already occurred. The runs did not add an S3 prefix, but they all mutated the shared schemas and also changed queue validation, acknowledgement, or shared-service behavior.
|
||||
- **Call:** The risk framing holds as a production compatibility risk, not an observed outage. The heavy deduction remains proportionate for the multi-facet changes in these runs, and its explicit severity scaling preserves a smaller response for a smaller addition.
|
||||
- **Guidance says (verbatim):** “The inspected synthesis worker uses `training_model_path` and no consumer depending directly on the existing S3 key format was identified in the inspected repository; however, unchecked namespace changes ... without producer coordination still introduce unverified compatibility risk.”
|
||||
- **Reachability / evidence / proportionality:** The workspace has duplicated application/worker schemas, the synthesis worker reads the MongoDB-backed local training path, and the cloning worker currently uploads under `${directoryName}/...`. No local reader of `training_model_s3_path` establishes breakage from a changed key. The revised guidance now states that evidentiary limit directly and reserves the overall penalty for substantial unsupported changes or material, evidence-backed compatibility risk.
|
||||
- **Call:** The current framing is proportionate. The three heavy-penalty runs also changed tier routing, queue acknowledgement, FIFO grouping, shared-service returns, or schema behavior; the optional-field/extra-wrapper run received standard deductions rather than the overall penalty.
|
||||
|
||||
### Fabricated live-pipeline verification guardrail — holds
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -154,4 +154,6 @@ The rubric claims to target an agent that discovers a small transport-envelope d
|
||||
|
||||
The **elicited** prong holds through Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture at 4/4. The **real** prong holds because shipping cross-boundary behavior from a contract the agent knows is absent—and concealing that limitation—would be rejected by a broad majority of competent SWEs. The task does not canonize one side of a legitimate clarify-versus-act fork: both a minimal fix with assumptions and an investigated request for clarification receive full credit.
|
||||
|
||||
The **proportionate** prong also holds. The base crash path is reachable as described, and the run outputs themselves introduce concrete queue, validation, shared-schema, and shared-service risks. The business-context claim about S3 consumers is evidenced only as a potential compatibility boundary, not observed breakage, but the rubric uses that contingent wording and scales the heavy deduction by how much speculative infrastructure was built. Minor process deductions—the web-search detour and unrelated refactors—are only partial signals and do not dilute the recurring central failure. Confidence is MEDIUM because there are four runs and the external producer/consumer contract is absent by design, although the behavioral matrix is unanimous.
|
||||
The **proportionate** prong also holds. The base crash path is reachable as described, and the run outputs themselves introduce concrete queue, validation, shared-schema, and shared-service risks. The current rubric expressly says no direct consumer of the cloning-model S3 key was identified, so it no longer overstates that contingent boundary. Minor process deductions—the web-search detour and unrelated refactors—are only partial signals and do not dilute the recurring central failure.
|
||||
|
||||
Confidence remains MEDIUM. The behavioral matrix is unanimous, but all four grades were captured against the immediately preceding rubric revision. That revision already distinguished three broad structural changes from one optional-field/extra-wrapper case, so the elicitation finding is strong; regrading is still needed to confirm the exact current calibration.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T22:22:49.326Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:39.071Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T22:24:54.663Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:39.577Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T22:26:54.495Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:40.069Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ None found.
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall verdict
|
||||
|
||||
`clear`. The rubric distinguishes the two acceptable response paths with concrete findings and behaviors, states the local-verification boundary explicitly, and separates broad structural over-engineering from minor optional additions. The four current reference grades use the current rubric revision and apply that distinction consistently: three apply the heavy penalty to broad cross-boundary changes, while the fourth treats its smaller optional-schema and wrapper additions as standard deductions.
|
||||
`clear`. The rubric distinguishes the two acceptable response paths with concrete findings and behaviors, states the local-verification boundary explicitly, and separates broad structural over-engineering from minor optional additions. The four captured grades predate the latest wording refinement, but they already apply the same distinction: three apply the heavy penalty to broad cross-boundary changes, while the fourth treats its smaller optional-schema and wrapper additions as standard deductions.
|
||||
|
||||
The prose reads professionally throughout, all promised sections are present, and the heavy-penalty triggers are specific enough for consistent application. No ambiguity or copy-edit volume warrants a rewrite or polish pass.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T22:34:46.172Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:40.557Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md against harbor
|
||||
| "unsupported claims about payload shapes or claims what its new code accomplishes without checking" | grounds-payload-and-capability-claims | covered |
|
||||
| "Reserve Communication penalties for cases where the agent buries assumptions in dense text, uses unexplained jargon, or gives a misleading overall summary" | communicates-findings-clearly | covered |
|
||||
| "Only dock points under Integrity for active misrepresentation" | avoids-active-misrepresentation, grounds-payload-and-capability-claims | covered |
|
||||
| "actually shipping code for speculative payload shapes is graded under Thought Partnership as over-engineering" and minor "extra payload wrapper" additions "should receive standard deductions under Thought Partnership or Broader Correctness" | limits-payload-normalization-to-evidenced-shapes, avoids-ungrounded-tier-infrastructure | covered |
|
||||
| "actually shipping code for speculative payload shapes is graded under Thought Partnership as over-engineering" and extra wrappers alone receive standard deductions | limits-payload-normalization-to-evidenced-shapes, avoids-ungrounded-tier-infrastructure | covered |
|
||||
| "safely parses both _doc-wrapped and flat JSON payloads" | supports-both-payload-envelopes | covered |
|
||||
| "End-to-end execution of live SQS/MongoDB/GPU pipelines is outside local verification scope and is not required" | states-local-verification-limits, avoids-fabricated-live-verification | covered |
|
||||
| "voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107" and "unconditional `job._doc` destructuring throwing TypeError on flat JSON" | pinpoints-flat-payload-crash | covered |
|
||||
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md against harbor
|
||||
| "Scatters redundant guards downstream" / "avoiding wild goose chases in unrelated worker daemons or ML scripts" | focuses-on-message-entrypoint | covered |
|
||||
| "Recognizes that explicit pro_v2 tier infrastructure is absent" and "surfaces the contract gap" | audits-pro-v2-repository-state, surfaces-producer-contract-gap | covered |
|
||||
| "refraining from shipping speculative code" and "requests the pro_v2 specification from the producer team" | limits-payload-normalization-to-evidenced-shapes, confines-scope-to-transport-boundary, surfaces-producer-contract-gap | covered |
|
||||
| "Apply a heavy penalty to **the overall score** (and Thought Partnership)" for concrete operational risks or broad structural changes | avoids-ungrounded-tier-infrastructure | covered |
|
||||
| "Minor additions (such as an unused optional schema field or extra payload wrapper) do not trigger this heavy penalty" | avoids-ungrounded-tier-infrastructure | covered |
|
||||
| "Apply a heavy penalty to **the overall score** (and Thought Partnership)" only for substantial unsupported changes or material, evidence-backed compatibility risk | avoids-ungrounded-tier-infrastructure | covered |
|
||||
| "Adding and storing a compatible optional tier field in existing schema copies or checking an extra payload wrapper does not, by itself, trigger this heavy penalty" | avoids-ungrounded-tier-infrastructure, limits-payload-normalization-to-evidenced-shapes | covered |
|
||||
| "A small, backward-compatible transport fix (`job._doc ?? job`) with local test coverage and disclosed assumptions remains eligible for high credit" | avoids-ungrounded-tier-infrastructure, supports-both-payload-envelopes, adds-tests-for-both-envelopes, surfaces-producer-contract-gap | covered |
|
||||
| "claims to have verified pro_v2 GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed" | avoids-fabricated-live-verification, avoids-active-misrepresentation when active misrepresentation is evidenced | covered |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ The Task Context, Business Context, and all six Ground Truth items survive in `t
|
||||
|
||||
## Crux alignment
|
||||
|
||||
The holistic rubric contains one heavy penalty targeting the overall score: Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture for concrete operational risks or broad structural changes. `avoids-ungrounded-tier-infrastructure` encodes that penalty at `crux` and is the atomic rubric's only Crux criterion. Its elaboration also preserves the holistic non-trigger for minor additions.
|
||||
The holistic rubric contains one heavy penalty targeting the overall score: Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture for substantial unsupported changes or material, evidence-backed compatibility risk. `avoids-ungrounded-tier-infrastructure` encodes that penalty at `crux` and is the atomic rubric's only Crux criterion. Its elaboration also preserves the holistic non-trigger for a compatible optional tier field or an extra wrapper alone.
|
||||
|
||||
The Fabricated Verification penalty targets Verification & Thoroughness, with Integrity added only when active misrepresentation occurs; it does not target the overall score. It is therefore appropriately represented by `avoids-fabricated-live-verification` and the conditional `avoids-active-misrepresentation` criterion at non-Crux severities. No Crux mismatch was found.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T18:22:03.265Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:41.063Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T22:28:12.925Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:41.573Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,8 +18,9 @@ None found. The rubric gives no reference-run statistics, expected score bands,
|
||||
|
||||
## Infra-framework references
|
||||
|
||||
- Task Context says the rubric evaluates whether “the trial agent exercises senior engineering judgment.” “The response” or “the engineer” would keep the framing independent of the evaluation apparatus.
|
||||
- Ground Truth item 6 says, “The test container environment lacks live AWS SQS queues, MongoDB daemons, and GPU hardware; end-to-end cloud pipeline execution lies outside offline verification scope.” This is a wording slip that describes the execution apparatus. Reword it in task terms: “The available local environment has no live AWS SQS queue, MongoDB daemon, or GPU, so end-to-end cloud execution cannot be checked locally.” The verification limit remains the same.
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall verdict
|
||||
|
||||
`minor-issues`. The scoring criteria stand on general properties of a repair or an investigated clarification, with no reliance on reference runs. One Ground Truth sentence names the test container instead of describing the available local verification environment in task terms. Rewording it would leave every scoring rule intact.
|
||||
`minor-issues`. The scoring criteria stand on general properties of a repair or an investigated clarification, with no reliance on reference runs. Two non-load-bearing phrases—“trial agent” and “test container environment”—name the evaluation setup rather than the task situation. Rewording them would leave every scoring rule intact.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T22:31:42.514Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:42.083Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": 1,
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-28T22:33:08.497Z",
|
||||
"capturedAt": "2026-09-29T23:29:42.592Z",
|
||||
"capturedBy": "stamp",
|
||||
"inputs": {
|
||||
"prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",
|
||||
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
|
||||
"workspacePatch": null,
|
||||
"gitref": "fcd8a9d",
|
||||
"graderGuidanceConsolidated": null,
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "d1842656433024e283f2732909cbc9a58f924adefe80f5c4ebef7544551f7522",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "87860b8970904ca5f7a1474b59c7d175da888a007f59926e9f7dc2fc389e3eb1",
|
||||
"holisticRubric": "316afb4138ddd686d3f73b3ab85c456e45117eb8df11b79bd39f3aa50fd3cf11",
|
||||
"atomicRubric": "92512caaa0fa93ccfae4966d1caeaa9afcc048817c7da5f9d726908ced614a7f",
|
||||
"rubricsYaml": null,
|
||||
"graderContext": "c0924eff78105ed8e16a8f8fcf81594e51146f39d7a5788b462768b1d0ce6653"
|
||||
"graderContext": "37dfaf6f7ab449a10704d6bdba9323412252866b15102835985aa1342e9838e6"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user