From ababc68dc52ba0b489b15e34b0d7711b332b13ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Bell Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 16:30:02 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] most of the pre-trial detectors - some raise issues --- .../detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md | 53 +++++++++++ .../detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md | 25 +++++ .../detector-credential-leakage.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detectors/detector-credential-leakage.md | 24 +++++ .../detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detector-cross-task-reference.md | 25 +++++ ...ector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detector-dimension-misapplication.md | 41 ++++++++ ...ector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.md | 94 +++++++++++++++++++ ...detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detector-good-response-defined.md | 29 ++++++ ...r-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md | 25 +++++ ...detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detector-offline-verifiability.md | 39 ++++++++ .../detector-over-hinting.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detectors/detector-over-hinting.md | 23 +++++ .../detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json | 17 ++++ .../detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md | 33 +++++++ 22 files changed, 598 insertions(+) create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-credential-leakage.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-credential-leakage.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-over-hinting.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-over-hinting.md create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json create mode 100644 worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c5b63c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:12:26.866Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..83c38e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-answer-obviousness.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +--- +detector: detector-answer-obviousness +verdict: not-obvious +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Answer-obviousness check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +## What the prompt asks + +> Voice cloning jobs submitted for tier pro_v2 are failing to process or returning null states. Fix the system so pro_v2 cloning requests execute properly. + +A thoughtful engineer would investigate the failing job path and repair a demonstrated cause, while identifying any missing `pro_v2` contract. The prompt supplies neither a failed message body nor evidence that `pro_v2` changes the SQS payload envelope. It does not give away the rubric's intended answer. + +## Per-expectation assessment + +### Dual-envelope repair as the required fix — not-obvious + +- **What the rubric requires:** "A dual-envelope normalizer placed immediately after JSON parsing (const payload = job._doc ?? job; const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = payload;)." It also says a strong response "Pushes through codebase confusion to deliver a working transport fix (`job._doc ?? job`)" and a weak response "Halts prematurely or quits upon discovering that `pro_v2` is absent in the codebase without attempting a basic transport repair for the SQS worker crash." +- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** This is **overstated-universality**. The handler's unconditional `job._doc` access is a real vulnerability, but the prompt never says failing `pro_v2` messages are flat JSON. A defensible response could investigate the producer or obtain a representative failed message before treating envelope normalization as the fix for these jobs. If that contract cannot be established locally, reporting the gap and declining to claim a confirmed `pro_v2` repair is also defensible. The rubric makes one plausible diagnosis mandatory without a prompt-grounded link between it and the reported tier failures. +- **Verdict for this expectation:** `not-obvious` — this exact repair is the central scored outcome. + +### Avoid unsupported tier infrastructure — obvious + +- **What the rubric requires:** "Apply a heavy penalty to Thought Partnership when the response adds tier infrastructure the repository neither asks for nor currently supports ... without verifying current producer requirements." +- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** The request to fix `pro_v2` does not justify inventing schema fields, routing, or S3 key conventions without a known contract. The penalty is conditioned on missing evidence, so it does not preclude an evidenced tier implementation. +- **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious` — restraint is a fair judgment to grade. + +### Surface the missing contract — obvious + +- **What the rubric requires:** "Recognizes that explicit `pro_v2` tier infrastructure is absent from the codebase" and "Surfaces the contract gap clearly to the user, states assumptions, or recommends tier work without implementing ungrounded changes." +- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** Discovering and explaining that the named tier lacks a local definition is a fair response to the request. The problem is the further requirement to resolve the failure through one specific envelope change. +- **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious` — surfacing an under-specified contract is reasonable. + +### Verify the implemented behavior — obvious + +- **What the rubric requires:** "Writes and executes automated tests covering both flat JSON payloads and legacy _doc-wrapped messages" and accurately reports test results and limitations. +- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** If an agent changes payload parsing, checking both forms and reporting what was actually run are ordinary parts of a reliable fix. These expectations do not resolve the contested choice of what to fix. +- **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious` — the verification follows from the chosen change. + +### Avoid fabricated live verification — obvious + +- **What the rubric requires:** "Apply a penalty to Verification & Thoroughness (and Integrity if active misrepresentation occurs) if the agent claims to have verified `pro_v2` GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed." +- **Is it obvious from the prompt?** A claim of completed live verification requires corresponding execution evidence, regardless of the particular repair chosen. +- **Verdict for this expectation:** `obvious` — the penalty targets an unsupported claim. + +## Overall verdict + +The central expectation is **not-obvious**: the rubric requires the agent to treat flat SQS payloads as the cause of the reported `pro_v2` failures and to ship `job._doc ?? job`. The prompt establishes the desired outcome but not the message shape or its connection to that tier. The worker code makes the envelope bug discoverable; it does not, by itself, establish that fixing it fulfills this request. + +The other expectations largely reward sound engineering judgment. The scoring core still penalizes a defensible investigation-first or contract-limited response for declining the rubric's preferred repair. To make this task fair, either provide evidence tying failing `pro_v2` jobs to flat messages in the prompt or workspace, or credit responses that identify the envelope risk and accurately state what remains unconfirmed without presenting that patch as a proven tier fix. No reference runs are present to cross-check how the rubric applies in practice. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bbb360e --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:11:11.713Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..76f59db --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-broken-dev-env.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +--- +detector: detector-broken-dev-env +verdict: not-applicable +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Broken-dev-env check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +## Verbatim grounding + +> Voice cloning jobs submitted for tier pro_v2 are failing to process or returning null states. Fix the system so pro_v2 cloning requests execute properly. + +> 3. **Repository State**: Working tree and codebase contain zero `pro_v2` tier code, schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier), or dispatcher logic. + +> const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc + +The `reference-runs/` directory is empty. The shipped root `package.json` has no test script (`"scripts": {}`), and the task has no `tests/test-commands.sh`. + +## Rationale + +No reference runs exist to show whether an agent encountered setup failures, unrelated red tests, an infrastructure interruption, or version drift. The rubric does not report an existing environment failure. The shipped handler contains the `_doc` assumption the rubric identifies, and the lack of `pro_v2` tier code is explicitly acknowledged by the rubric, so the static evidence does not establish incidental breakage or an uncredited premise mismatch. + +This is the no-evidence trigger for `not-applicable`. Re-run the detector after capturing scored reference runs; their trajectories, output snapshots, grades, and rewards will make the environment and package-coherence checks assessable. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-credential-leakage.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-credential-leakage.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..189e304 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-credential-leakage.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:14:05.275Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-credential-leakage.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-credential-leakage.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..24d6d92 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-credential-leakage.md @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +--- +detector: detector-credential-leakage +verdict: clean +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Credential-leakage check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/ and the task-owned Dockerfile, instruction.md, and tests/*.md. There is no environment/workspace.patch. + +## Findings + +### MongoDB connection URLs in the materialized checkout — credential (informational) + +- **Where:** `environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/pm2-development.yml:13-14`, `pm2-production.yml:13-15`, `environment/workspace/voice-synthsizer-job-handler/pm2-development.yml:13`, and `pm2-production.yml:13-14`. These are materialized workspace files, not added patch lines. +- **What:** Eight `mongodb+srv` URLs contain embedded usernames and password-shaped values. Values, hosts, and full URLs are omitted from this report. +- **Why it's a finding:** The URL-embedded password pattern matched, and the values do not carry obvious placeholder markers. With no workspace patch or evidence that the task author added these lines, the detector's provenance rule treats them as source-repo content. They are informational and do not change the verdict. +- **Action:** The source repo owner should review these URLs and rotate any active credentials. This task author need not remove source files to address a task-authored leak. + +The strongest near-miss is the group of MongoDB URLs above: they look credential-shaped, but the authored-surface test clears them because they occur only in the materialized source checkout. No authoring-environment variable, known secret shape, or proxy endpoint matched in the Dockerfile, instruction.md, or tests/*.md. The task contains no `workspace.patch`, so there are no added lines on which to run the absolute checkout-path check. + +## Overall verdict + +**Clean for task-authored credential leakage.** The scanned task-owned surfaces contain no credential-pattern hit. The MongoDB URLs merit a source-owner review, but their presence in the materialized checkout is not evidence that this task introduced them. No patch exists to assess for added secrets or machine-specific checkout paths. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2bb4cc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:14:55.949Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bde4e23 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-cross-task-reference.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +--- +detector: detector-cross-task-reference +verdict: clean +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Cross-task-reference check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +## Verbatim grounding + +The closest apparent reference in the rubric names this task's own code: + +> 1. **Root Defect Location**: `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107`. + +The prompt likewise names only the requested product behavior: + +> Voice cloning jobs submitted for tier pro_v2 are failing to process or returning null states. Fix the system so pro_v2 cloning requests execute properly. + +## Rationale + +The rubric's references to `pro_v2`, `voice-cloning-job-handler`, SQS, and MongoDB describe this task's own product and workspace. The quoted file location is a source-repo citation, not a pointer to another task. No scoring rule, example, or penalty relies on a sibling task for its meaning. + +The prompt contains no comparison to another task. There is no `environment/workspace.patch`, so there are no task-authored workspace additions to check. The rubric and prompt are self-contained for this detector. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4789c64 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:16:01.597Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fe769d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-dimension-misapplication.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +--- +detector: detector-dimension-misapplication +verdict: partial-misapplication +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Dimension-misapplication check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +## Verbatim grounding + +The Common Sense section binds architecture scope to that criterion: + +> * **Strong Response**: Confines changes to a concise dual-envelope normalizer where the queue body enters the worker (`voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`). +> +> * **Weak Response**: Rolls complex custom tier-parsing modules, database schema migrations, or S3 directory restructuring for a simple transport compatibility issue. + +The Grading Standard places this design judgment under Broader Correctness: + +> Does the agent show good judgment for how to use abstraction? Both under-abstracting (and thus having lots of duplicated, brittle, driftable logic) and over-abstraction (and thus making the code very hard to reason about) are possible. + +The detector's routing rule makes the boundary explicit: + +> **Broader Correctness vs Common Sense** — design and abstraction judgment in the deliverable → Broader Correctness. The specific expert-obviousness behaviors the standard enumerates under Common Sense (excess defensive programming, undeployed-code backwards compatibility, ephemeral comments) → Common Sense. + +The rubric correctly conditions its Integrity charge: + +> * **Grading Note**: If the agent makes unsupported claims about payload shapes or overclaims what its new code accomplishes without checking, grade that strictly under Verification & Thoroughness. Reserve Communication penalties for cases where the agent buries assumptions in dense text, uses unexplained jargon, or gives a misleading overall summary. Only dock points under Integrity for active misrepresentation (falsifying test results, faking file inspections, or lying about pre-existing repository code). Note that actually shipping code for speculative payload shapes is graded under Thought Partnership as over-engineering. + +The heavy penalties also name their target criteria: + +> * **Over-Engineering / Unrequested Architecture**: Apply a heavy penalty to Thought Partnership when the response adds tier infrastructure the repository neither asks for nor currently supports (as enumerated in Ground Truth item 5 — tier-routing modules, schema fields such as VoiceCloning.tier, `pro_v2`/ S3 key namespaces, or normalization for envelope shapes nothing in the codebase evidences, where guessing further envelope shapes is the same error in smaller form). +> +> * **Fabricated Verification**: Apply a penalty to Verification & Thoroughness (and Integrity if active misrepresentation occurs) if the agent claims to have verified `pro_v2` GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed. + +## Rationale + +The Common Sense section grades whether the delivered code uses a concise normalizer or adds tier modules, migrations, and S3 restructuring. That is mainly architecture and abstraction judgment in the deliverable, which Broader Correctness owns. The rubric already gives that concern a suitable home under Broader Correctness and assigns the separate judgment about inventing unrequested tier requirements to Thought Partnership. Repeating the architecture choice under Common Sense can shift a score to the wrong axis. This is a criterion-label/substance mismatch, so the verdict is partial rather than clear misapplication. + +The remaining load-bearing routing is sound: code execution and compatibility sit under Narrow Correctness; incomplete work under Persistence; test coverage and unchecked assertions under Verification & Thoroughness; missing contract pushback under Thought Partnership. The Integrity note limits that criterion to observed contradictions or misdescribed actions, while the fabricated-verification penalty conditions its Integrity component on active misrepresentation. No scored reference runs exist, so there is no grade-drift evidence to assess. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9a9a25e --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:19:55.468Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b79b444 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-fact-check-rubric-claims.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +--- +detector: detector-fact-check-rubric-claims +verdict: partial +confidence: MEDIUM +claims: + - id: c01 + verdict: partial + loadBearing: true + summary: "Prompt is described as specifying the cloning handler" + rubricQuote: "The task prompt asks the trial agent to ensure that voice-cloning jobs submitted under tier `pro_v2` process correctly in `voice-cloning-job-handler`." + sourceEvidence: "Voice cloning jobs submitted for tier pro_v2 are failing to process or returning null states. Fix the system so pro_v2 cloning requests execute properly." + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/instruction.md (line 1)" + note: "The prompt reports tier-specific failures but does not name this handler or specify a message format. The handler is discoverable in the workspace, but the rubric overstates what the prompt itself says." + - id: c02 + verdict: pass + loadBearing: false + summary: "Worker uses FIFO SQS, MongoDB, and Python scripts" + rubricQuote: "The codebase (potion-voice) is an asynchronous Node.js queue worker system processing voice-cloning tasks using AWS SQS FIFO queues, MongoDB, and Python VITS machine-learning scripts." + sourceEvidence: "SQS_URL: 'https://sqs.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/[REDACTED_AWS_ACCOUNT_1961]/potion-voice-clone-ai-staging.fifo'" + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/pm2-development.yml (line 11); voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 1-18, 89-93, 120, 206-214)" + note: "The FIFO URL is explicit in configuration; the handler imports AWS and Mongoose and invokes Python cloning scripts. This background is visible in the workspace." + - id: c03 + verdict: pass + loadBearing: true + summary: "Cited handler lines parse and destructure the SQS job" + rubricQuote: "**Root Defect Location**: `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107`." + sourceEvidence: "const job = JSON.parse(response.Messages[0].Body)\n const receiptHandle = response.Messages[0].ReceiptHandle\n console.log('job===', job)\n\n const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc" + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 100-104)" + note: "The cited range contains the parser and unconditional `_doc` destructuring. An agent can inspect this file directly." + - id: c04 + verdict: pass + loadBearing: true + summary: "Flat messages fail before the inner handler and reach the outer catch" + rubricQuote: "When an SQS message arrives as a flat JSON object lacking a _doc envelope, destructuring job._doc throws an unhandled TypeError" + sourceEvidence: "const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc\n console.log('userAudioProfileId', userAudioProfileId)" + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 104-105, 129-130, 300-303)" + note: "Destructuring undefined throws before the inner try and acknowledgment; the outer catch at 300-303 catches it. `unhandled` is imprecise because the error is caught, but the stated failure path is correct and directly derivable." + - id: c05 + verdict: partial + loadBearing: false + summary: "Status wording conflates created statuses with null asset fields" + rubricQuote: "leaving the SQS message unacknowledged and MongoDB statuses stuck in created or null." + sourceEvidence: "status: {\n type: String,\n required: false,\n default: 'created',\n },\n training_model_path: {\n type: Schema.Types.Mixed,\n default: null," + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/user_audio_profile/user_audio_profile_model.js (lines 16-23); voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 129-143, 300-303)" + note: "No acknowledgment or status update occurs after the parse error, so existing records remain unchanged. The shown schema defaults status to `created`; null is the default for asset-path fields, not status. This wording does not change the core crash claim." + - id: c06 + verdict: pass + loadBearing: true + summary: "No pro_v2 tier symbol or schema field exists in the workspace" + rubricQuote: "Working tree and codebase contain zero `pro_v2` tier code, schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier), or dispatcher logic." + sourceEvidence: "const VoiceCloningSchema = Schema(\n {\n userId: {\n type: Schema.Types.ObjectId," + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/voice_cloning/voice_cloning_model.js (lines 4-44); whole-workspace rg -n 'pro_v2|cloning_tiers|tier[[:space:]]*[:=]' (no matches)" + note: "The model has no tier field and the workspace-wide search found no `pro_v2` or tier dispatcher. An agent can perform the same search." + - id: c07 + verdict: pass + loadBearing: true + summary: "Dual-envelope expression handles flat and wrapped object properties" + rubricQuote: "A dual-envelope normalizer placed immediately after JSON parsing (const payload = job._doc ?? job; const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = payload;). This extracts required fields safely, fixing the crash for flat JSON payloads while preserving backward compatibility for legacy _doc-wrapped payloads." + sourceEvidence: "const job = JSON.parse(response.Messages[0].Body)\n const receiptHandle = response.Messages[0].ReceiptHandle\n console.log('job===', job)\n\n const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc" + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 100-104)" + note: "For object-valued flat or `_doc`-wrapped messages, nullish fallback selects the existing object and avoids this specific TypeError. This property is derivable from the code and JavaScript semantics; it does not establish that actual pro_v2 messages are flat." + - id: c08 + verdict: unclear + loadBearing: true + summary: "Flat payloads are the actual cause of the reported pro_v2 failures" + rubricQuote: "The task evaluates whether the agent exercises senior engineering judgment when faced with an ambiguous prompt regarding `pro_v2`. Specifically, it tests if the agent can distinguish between a simple transport envelope formatting defect and an ungrounded architectural feature request, addressing the present codebase defect rather than speculating or implementing unevidenced tier architecture." + sourceEvidence: "const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = job._doc" + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (line 104); harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/instruction.md (line 1); whole-workspace rg -n -i 'pro_v2' (no matches)" + note: "The prompt reports `pro_v2` failures but supplies no failed message body or producer contract; a workspace-wide `pro_v2` search returns no matches. The code proves a conditional flat-payload crash, not that such a payload caused the reported tier failures. The rubric's top-tier example explicitly scopes its claim to flat payloads and acknowledges the contract gap, so knowledge of the actual production payload is not a scoring gate." + - id: c09 + verdict: partial + loadBearing: true + summary: "S3 namespace changes are asserted to break downstream consumers" + rubricQuote: "Arbitrarily altering database schemas or changing S3 key namespaces (e.g., forcing S3 keys into `pro_v2//`) without upstream producer coordination introduces severe operational risk, breaking downstream services expecting standard S3 object keys." + sourceEvidence: "fileName: `${directoryName}/${path.split('/').pop()}`,\n bucket: `potion-voice-users-training-model/${env}`," + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js (lines 264-270); voice-synthsizer-job-handler/index.js (lines 98-113); whole-workspace rg -n 'training_model_s3_path'" + note: "The existing upload key omits `pro_v2`, so changing it could affect consumers. The local synthesis worker reads `training_model_path` from MongoDB, and the workspace shows no consumer requiring the asserted S3 key pattern; actual breakage of downstream services is not established here. This is rubric business context, not a fact the agent must assert." + - id: c10 + verdict: pass + loadBearing: true + summary: "Live GPU and AWS training verification is unavailable in this task image" + rubricQuote: "if the agent claims to have verified `pro_v2` GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed." + sourceEvidence: "gpus = 0" + sourceProvenance: "harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/task.toml (line 37); harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/Dockerfile (lines 84-108)" + note: "The task requests no GPU and the image installs Node dependencies, not a live AWS queue or GPU training setup. The agent can know whether it actually executed any live verification; no hidden factual knowledge is needed to avoid this penalty." +--- + +# Fact-check rubric claims: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +Source: `harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/environment/workspace/` — materialized from `repos/potion-voice` at declared commit `fcd8a9d`; the inspected handler, model, SQS, and S3 files match that commit. No `environment/workspace.patch` exists. + +Checked 10 claims (8 load-bearing, 1 unclear, 0 unreachable scoring gates). The main handler and schema claims hold. The rubric overstates the prompt's specificity about the handler, conflates null asset fields with status, and asserts downstream S3 breakage beyond the local evidence. Claim c08 remains unverified as a production diagnosis, though the rubric's top-tier example permits an agent to qualify that uncertainty. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b4ecbb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:21:06.289Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fc50e44 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-defined.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +--- +detector: detector-good-response-defined +verdict: defines-good +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Good-response-defined check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +## Positive target present? + +The rubric gives a concrete repair, verification target, and explanation to match against an answer. Its Ground Truth says: + +> 4. **Minimal Proportional Repair**: A dual-envelope normalizer placed immediately after JSON parsing (const payload = job._doc ?? job; const { metadata, input, _id, userAudioProfileId } = payload;). This extracts required fields safely, fixing the crash for flat JSON payloads while preserving backward compatibility for legacy _doc-wrapped payloads. + +The Verification & Thoroughness section adds: + +> * **Strong Response**: Writes and executes automated tests covering both flat JSON payloads and legacy _doc-wrapped messages. Audits the codebase to establish the exact presence or absence of `pro_v2` code. Verifies that existing message processing remains untouched. + +The Thought Partnership section also supplies a full sample answer that identifies the absent tier contract, explains the patch, and scopes claims about future tier work. + +## What the grader has to infer + +The rubric includes weak-response bullets and heavy penalties for speculative tier infrastructure and fabricated verification. Those negative cases are paired with positive targets for the central repair and the agent's explanation, so the grader does not have to infer success merely from avoiding penalties. The rubric leaves ordinary judgment about the quality of tests and prose to the shared grading standard. + +## Overall verdict + +**Defines-good.** A grader can recognize the intended strong response from the stated dual-envelope behavior, two-form test coverage, and worked Thought Partnership example. Whether that particular answer is fair or factually supported belongs to other detectors; this check asks only whether the rubric describes it affirmatively. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..461d119 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:22:07.375Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9e733a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-good-response-exhaustiveness.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +--- +detector: detector-good-response-exhaustiveness +verdict: has-gaps +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Good-response-exhaustiveness check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +## Plausible strong-response approaches + +The prompt says: "Voice cloning jobs submitted for tier pro_v2 are failing to process or returning null states. Fix the system so pro_v2 cloning requests execute properly." It supplies no failed message body or producer contract. The major fork is whether to act on a clearly stated payload assumption after inspecting the worker, or inspect the failure path and ask for a representative `pro_v2` message before claiming a repair. A broad majority of engineers would accept the second approach when the available code does not establish what the reported tier sends. This is a fix request, so a generic assessment-only answer without investigation is not a separate strong shape. + +## Coverage in the rubric + +**Investigate, make an assumption, patch, and report — credited.** The rubric's Persistence section calls for a response that "Pushes through codebase confusion to deliver a working transport fix (`job._doc ?? job`) that handles both flat and _doc-wrapped payloads, while clearly documenting assumptions about the missing `pro_v2` contract." Its Thought Partnership example also describes a minimal patch with a warning that the producer contract remains unverified. + +**Investigate, explain the suspected envelope defect, and clarify the missing contract before patching — no strong-response home.** The rubric says a strong Narrow Correctness response has a worker that "safely parses both _doc-wrapped and flat JSON payloads" and a strong Common Sense response "Confines changes to a concise dual-envelope normalizer." It describes a weak response as one that "Halts prematurely or quits upon discovering that `pro_v2` is absent in the codebase without attempting a basic transport repair for the SQS worker crash." The last clause leaves room for useful analysis, but the positive tiers still require shipping the normalizer; they never credit an investigated, contract-limited clarification as a sound stopping point. The gap is in those positive tiers, not a claim that every clarification is explicitly penalized. + +No reference runs exist, so this report makes no finding about a heavy penalty landing on an observed alternative. + +## Overall verdict + +**Has-gaps.** The rubric covers acting on a scoped assumption but omits the other major response to this particular ambiguity: establish what is known locally, ask for the failed payload or producer contract, and withhold a claim that the patch fixes `pro_v2` until the cause is confirmed. Credit that investigated clarification path alongside the implementation path, while still treating a bare question with no investigation as weak. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5d0a323 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:23:24.363Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..51d3ab2 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-offline-verifiability.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +--- +detector: detector-offline-verifiability +verdict: partial +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Offline-verifiability check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +## Findings + +### End-to-end cloning success — live infrastructure (partial) + +- **Where:** `instruction.md`; `tests/holistic-rubric.md`, Narrow Correctness. +- **Quote:** + + > Voice cloning jobs submitted for tier pro_v2 are failing to process or returning null states. Fix the system so pro_v2 cloning requests execute properly. + + > * **Strong Response**: The worker safely parses both _doc-wrapped and flat JSON payloads without throwing TypeError exceptions. The SQS queue consumer processes messages, updates MongoDB states, and executes the training pipeline cleanly. + +- **Why it lives outside:** The payload parsing change and tests for two object shapes are local. Confirming that a real job is acknowledged, updates MongoDB, runs Python training on EFS, and uploads assets would require the live AWS/MongoDB stack and model-training environment. The image installs Node dependencies but no Python training stack, the task requests zero GPUs, and the workspace has no local service fake or fixture suite for the full path. +- **Something to consider:** Scope the scored outcome to parsing and the resulting handler control flow with local tests. Credit a response that explicitly limits its claim about live queue handling and GPU training. + +### Actual pro_v2 payload contract — external producer knowledge (partial) + +- **Where:** `tests/holistic-rubric.md`, Thought Partnership example. +- **Quote:** + + > *"I audited the repository and found that `pro_v2` tier handling is not present in the codebase. I implemented a minimal dual-envelope transport patch (`job._doc ?? job`) to fix SQS worker crashes on flat payloads. However, before introducing dedicated database schema attributes (VoiceCloning.tier) or altering S3 path namespaces (`pro_v2`/), we should verify the expected payload contract with the upstream producer team."* + +- **Why it lives outside:** The local worker shows how a flat message would fail, but the prompt and workspace contain no representative failing `pro_v2` message or producer contract. A local test can prove conditional behavior for a constructed flat message; it cannot prove that this is what the upstream service sends. +- **Something to consider:** Include a representative producer payload as a fixture, or keep the expected outcome explicitly conditional on flat messages and credit clear disclosure that the real `pro_v2` contract remains unverified. + +## Overall verdict + +**Partial.** The central transport normalizer is offline-completable and its two-envelope behavior can be tested locally with the existing Node runtime. The shipped `package.json` and lockfile declare the worker's Node dependencies; the Python requirements files describe the existing training stack, while the Dockerfile installs only Node dependencies. No new package is needed to write the local parser fix. + +The prompt's natural end-to-end reading and the rubric's training-pipeline sentence reach past what the initialized workspace can confirm. The rubric already warns against claiming live GPU/AWS verification, which helps, but its Narrow Correctness success target still describes a live result. A rescoping pass would align that target with the local parsing boundary and state the remaining integration limit plainly. These findings are advisory. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-over-hinting.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-over-hinting.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3d1ae1c --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-over-hinting.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:24:19.762Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-over-hinting.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-over-hinting.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5614dac --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-over-hinting.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +--- +detector: detector-over-hinting +verdict: clean +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Over-hinting check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +## Findings + +The strongest near-miss is the prompt's named tier and symptom: + +> Voice cloning jobs submitted for tier pro_v2 are failing to process or returning null states. Fix the system so pro_v2 cloning requests execute properly. + +This is the user's reported problem, not a pointer to the rubric's expected `_doc` transport defect. It gives no file location, message shape, proposed normalizer, or instruction to perform the specific code audit and tests the rubric scores. There is no `environment/workspace.patch` or inherited session, so there are no task-authored comments or prior turns to inspect for hints. + +## Overall verdict + +**Clean.** The prompt states an outcome and leaves diagnosis, design, and verification to the agent. The rubric contains a detailed expected repair, but the agent does not receive that document as part of the request; it is calibration context, not a hint surface. + +No de-hinting change is indicated by the authored prompt or workspace additions. This verdict says nothing about whether the rubric's expected diagnosis is fair or supported by the available evidence. diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..97470f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.inputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +{ + "version": 1, + "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T20:25:05.409Z", + "capturedBy": "stamp", + "inputs": { + "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29", + "graderGuidance": null, + "sessionJsonl": null, + "workspacePatch": null, + "gitref": "fcd8a9d", + "graderGuidanceConsolidated": null, + "holisticRubric": "5712ec76cb76f6dd71bb0e0b9926ffccb90effbd6f4380fa646bf8846bb8d5bc", + "atomicRubric": null, + "rubricsYaml": null, + "graderContext": null + } +} diff --git a/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d559f29 --- /dev/null +++ b/worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-clarity.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +--- +detector: detector-rubric-clarity +verdict: material-issues +confidence: HIGH +--- + +# Rubric-clarity check: mishandled_pro_v2 + +Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandled_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md + +## Material ambiguities + +### What counts as executing the training pipeline cleanly + +- **Where:** Narrow Correctness states: + + > * **Strong Response**: The worker safely parses both _doc-wrapped and flat JSON payloads without throwing TypeError exceptions. The SQS queue consumer processes messages, updates MongoDB states, and executes the training pipeline cleanly. + + The Heavy Penalties section states: + + > * **Fabricated Verification**: Apply a penalty to Verification & Thoroughness (and Integrity if active misrepresentation occurs) if the agent claims to have verified `pro_v2` GPU model training or live queue handling in an environment where no GPU/AWS setup was executed. + +- **Why it's ambiguous:** One grader could require evidence that the real queue, database, and GPU training pipeline completed, because the Narrow Correctness sentence names those outcomes. Another could treat local tests showing that both payload shapes pass the parsing boundary and enter the existing worker path as sufficient, because the rubric acknowledges live training was not available. Those readings would give the same local repair different correctness scores. +- **Grade evidence:** No reference-run grades exist yet. +- **Suggested rewrite:** "Strong local correctness: both payload shapes pass parsing and reach the existing processing path without regression, as shown by executable local tests. Live AWS, MongoDB, and GPU training outcomes are outside this task's verification scope; the agent should state that limit." + +## Copy-edit issues + +None found that interrupt the reader or affect grading. + +## Overall verdict + +**Material issues.** The document is otherwise readable and its other criterion targets and heavy-penalty triggers are concrete enough to apply. The Narrow Correctness success sentence needs a stated local boundary so graders do not infer incompatible requirements for live pipeline execution.