eric/project-work
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

added 260907 version of worker toolkit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Eric Bell
2026-09-08 20:30:51 -04:00
parent cbd3f0f8ca
commit 97aca37663
1283 changed files with 142951 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

42
worker-toolkit-flaredown/.claude/skills/detector-rubric-clarity/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
---
name: detector-rubric-clarity
description: |
Self-check your holistic rubric for whether it's well-written
enough for a grader to apply consistently. Catches material ambiguity in
scoring tiers, heavy penalties, and pass/fail criteria, plus typos, grammar
errors, and disfluent prose that interrupt the reader. Doesn't flag
every microscopic ambiguity or awkward sentence — only what would
actually affect grading or block use.
allowed-tools: Bash, Read, Write
---
# Rubric-clarity detector
This skill checks the prose of your holistic rubric (the file
`bash scripts/guidance-target.sh <slug>` resolves) for two failure shapes:
material ambiguity in load-bearing wording (scoring tiers, heavy penalties,
pass/fail criteria that two reasonable graders could apply differently)
and copy-edit issues (typos, grammar errors, disfluent sentences) that
make the doc fail to read professionally.
Read these before deciding:
1. `.claude/skills/_detector-worker-shell.md` — where to write the report and how to handle re-runs.
2. `.claude/skills/detector-rubric-clarity/core.md` — what counts as material ambiguity vs. copy-edit issues, verdict definitions, frontmatter/body schema.
Compose the report per the schema in `core.md` and write it per `_detector-worker-shell.md`.
## Acting on the verdict
- **`clear`** — the rubric reads professionally and the scoring criteria
pin down what a grader should look for. Good.
- **`minor-issues`** — small copy-edit nits worth polishing but no
load-bearing ambiguity. Look at the issues list in the report; tighten
them up. No need to rebuild the rubric.
- **`material-issues`** — at least one load-bearing scoring criterion is
ambiguous, OR the prose has enough errors that the doc doesn't read
professionally. Look at the "material ambiguities" section in the
report — those are the wordings to rewrite. Re-run this skill after
rewriting.
- **`not-applicable`** — the rubric is missing, empty, or template-only.
Write the rubric first, then come back to this skill.