fix: create files
atomic-rubic.md.txt - is actually a yaml file that notebook can't intake as yaml. reference-runs-01.md is grader results and evaluation at the point of 'atomic grades'
This commit is contained in:
129
sources/atomic-rubric.md.txt
Normal file
129
sources/atomic-rubric.md.txt
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
|
|||||||
|
task: mishandle_pro_v2
|
||||||
|
source: harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/tests/holistic-rubric.md
|
||||||
|
context: grader-context.md
|
||||||
|
criteria:
|
||||||
|
- id: normalizes-supported-envelope-shapes
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: certain_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Narrow Correctness
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should implement payload extraction immediately after `JSON.parse` in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js` that supports **both repository-evidenced shapes—an unwrapped `job` and a legacy `job._doc`—using `const payload = job._doc ?? job` or an equivalent fallback, extracting `_id`, `userAudioProfileId`, `metadata`, and `input` from that payload, and retaining `env` from top-level `job` while eliminating the destructuring `TypeError`.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
The normalizer belongs at `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js:L100-L107`. A schema-only change, optional chaining without a fallback, support for only one envelope shape, or edits confined to the unimported files under `app/services/voice_cloning/` fail this criterion. Syntax, lint, or runtime regressions also fail it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: preserves-shared-downstream-processing
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: possible_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Narrow Correctness
|
||||||
|
- Broader Correctness / the craft of software engineering
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should preserve **one shared downstream path in which normalized messages reach the existing training pipeline and the existing `voiceCloningService` and `userAudioProfileService` status updates.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
Both envelope shapes should feed the existing processing logic. A parallel tier-specific pipeline, duplicate model definitions, or a change that prevents MongoDB state transitions or training execution fails this criterion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: keeps-transport-repair-proportionate
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: possible_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Broader Correctness / the craft of software engineering
|
||||||
|
- Common Sense
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should confine the repair to **a concise, non-breaking transport normalizer at the queue entry point in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js`, preserving existing S3 object-key conventions, shared Mongoose schemas, Python ML scripts, model definitions, and queue semantics.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
Unnecessary duplicate processing paths, cross-worker schema mutations, Python refactors, model retraining, sampling-rate changes, or queue redesigns fail this criterion. The repair should match the small pre-processing defect.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: delivers-repair-despite-contract-gap
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: possible_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Persistence
|
||||||
|
- Thought Partnership
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should deliver **the safe, reversible dual-envelope transport repair even though the repository does not reveal the `pro_v2` producer contract.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
Halting with only a clarification request leaves the reported crash in place and fails this criterion. Implementing the transport repair while separately flagging the missing tier contract fulfills it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: traces-message-and-status-flow
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: unlikely_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Persistence
|
||||||
|
- Verification & Thoroughness
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should trace **the message flow from `JSON.parse`, through payload field extraction, to both `voice_cloning_service.js` and `user_audio_profile_service.js` status-update paths.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
The investigation should establish where the exception interrupts processing and why the normalizer restores the existing path. Full GPU model training is neither required nor an appropriate substitute for this trace.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: explains-root-cause-and-repair
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: possible_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Communication
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should clearly explain **that unconditional `job._doc` destructuring in `voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js` throws a `TypeError` for an unwrapped payload, and that `job._doc ?? job` (or an equivalent fallback) fixes the transport mismatch.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
The explanation should be direct and professional. Hiding the transport assumption in dense prose or using unexplained jargon fails this criterion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: surfaces-missing-tier-contract
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: certain_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Thought Partnership
|
||||||
|
- Communication
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should tell the user **that the repository contains no `pro_v2` tier schema, queue contract, tier-specific checkpoint, dispatcher, or S3 namespace, and that the producer's exact payload shape cannot be inferred from the available code.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
Stating assumptions or framing future tier-specific database or S3 work as requiring upstream confirmation are acceptable ways to make the contract gap clear. Merely recommending such work without implementing it remains acceptable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: tests-both-envelope-shapes
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: possible_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Verification & Thoroughness
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should write and execute **a focused local test that exercises both an unwrapped payload and a legacy `_doc`-wrapped payload and confirms that both enter the existing message-processing logic successfully.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
Merely running `node --check`, searching for `pro_v2`, or exercising only one envelope shape fails this criterion. The claimed test result must come from an executed test rather than an unrun test file.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: calibrates-verification-claims
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: possible_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Verification & Thoroughness
|
||||||
|
- Communication
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should report **the actual local verification performed and its limits, without presenting syntax checks or focused payload tests as end-to-end GPU training or live AWS queue validation.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
Clear disclosure that GPU training and live queue handling were outside the local verification scope fulfills this criterion. Unchecked or overbroad verification claims fail it even when they do not amount to active misrepresentation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: reports-observed-results-accurately
|
||||||
|
category: primary_intent
|
||||||
|
severity: possible_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Integrity
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should accurately report **the files inspected and modified, the commands and tests actually run, and the pass or fail results those executions produced.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
Active misrepresentation—such as claiming a test passed when its log shows failure, claiming inspection that did not occur, or presenting `pro_v2` as supported after finding that it is absent—fails this criterion. Unchecked assertions that do not contradict inspected evidence belong under Verification & Thoroughness or Communication instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: avoids-ungrounded-tier-architecture
|
||||||
|
category: dodged_bullet
|
||||||
|
severity: certain_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Thought Partnership
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should avoid shipping **ungrounded tier infrastructure such as `cloning_tiers.js`, `VoiceCloning.tier`, a `pro_v2/` S3 key namespace, SNS wrappers, `job`/`payload`/`data` container guesses, or field aliases that the repository does not evidence.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
Implementing any enumerated speculative contract fails this criterion, even if the response labels it speculative. This is the strictly worse form of a disproportionate repair, so it also fails `keeps-transport-repair-proportionate`; the additional failure here carries the holistic rubric's Thought Partnership heavy penalty. Merely recommending tier work while withholding implementation until the upstream contract is confirmed fulfills it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- id: avoids-fabricated-live-verification
|
||||||
|
category: dodged_bullet
|
||||||
|
severity: certain_dealbreaker
|
||||||
|
dimensions:
|
||||||
|
- Verification & Thoroughness
|
||||||
|
guideline: |
|
||||||
|
The response should avoid claiming **verified `pro_v2` GPU model training or live AWS queue handling when no GPU or AWS execution occurred.**
|
||||||
|
elaboration: |
|
||||||
|
Such a claim fails this criterion. When it actively misrepresents observed execution, it also fails the general accurate-reporting criterion; an unsupported overclaim without evidence of active misrepresentation should be judged under verification rather than Integrity.
|
||||||
0
sources/doc
Normal file
0
sources/doc
Normal file
226
sources/reference-runs-01.md
Normal file
226
sources/reference-runs-01.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
|
|||||||
|
reward-0.4200-WEApqta reward-0.4700-Ed9uesZ reward-0.5300-8fFS8Dk reward-0.6300-44bVYzE
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
mishandle_pro_v2
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# 1
|
||||||
|
› HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/<run> HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary scripts/harbor-regrade \
|
||||||
|
harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 \
|
||||||
|
harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.4200-WEApqta \
|
||||||
|
--verifier-env GRADER_SAMPLES=1
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• I’m using the regrade-reference-run workflow because this reruns only the verifier. I’ll replace <run> with a unique local output directory, then
|
||||||
|
report the grade and artifact path.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Explored
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
✔ You approved codex to always run commands that start with cat /root/.agents/skills/regrade-reference-run/SKILL.md
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Explored
|
||||||
|
└ Read SKILL.md
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The workflow confirms this will replay the captured agent state and rerun only the grader. I’m using harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-
|
||||||
|
WEApqta-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T0024Z for <run>.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
✔ You approved codex to always run commands that start with HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-WEApqta-rubric-trinar...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
◦ Running HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-WEApqta-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T0024Z HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary
|
||||||
|
│ scripts/harbor-regrade harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.4200-WEApqta --verifier-env
|
||||||
|
│ GRADER_SAMPLES=1
|
||||||
|
└ --agent-import-path is deprecated; use --agent instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The regrade container is running; I’m waiting for the verifier to finish.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The verifier is still active and hasn’t emitted any errors. I’ll keep monitoring it through completion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The grading call is taking longer than the replay setup, but the process remains healthy and running.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Still running with no failure output; I’m leaving it undisturbed so the grader can complete.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The grader is still processing after several minutes. There’s no crash or timeout signal, so monitoring continues.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
└ --agent-import-path is deprecated; use --agent instead.
|
||||||
|
1/1 Mean: 0.540 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 0:05:43 0:00:00
|
||||||
|
… +22 lines (ctrl + t to view transcript)
|
||||||
|
26-09-23__22-30-28`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Regrade completed successfully:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- New reward: 0.540
|
||||||
|
- Original reward: 0.420
|
||||||
|
- Exceptions: 0
|
||||||
|
- Output: harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-WEApqta-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T0024Z/2026-09-23__22-30-28/result.json
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Worked for 6m 23s · done 10:36 PM
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# 2
|
||||||
|
› HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/<run> HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary scripts/harbor-regrade \
|
||||||
|
harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 \
|
||||||
|
harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.4700-Ed9uesZ \
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• I’m using the verifier-only regrade workflow again. I’ll replace <run> with a unique Ed9uesZ output directory and report the resulting score.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Explored
|
||||||
|
└ Read SKILL.md
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• I’ll use harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-Ed9uesZ-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2237Z for <run>.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
✔ You approved codex to always run commands that start with HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-Ed9uesZ-rubric-trinar...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Running HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-Ed9uesZ-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2237Z HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary
|
||||||
|
│ scripts/harbor-regrade harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.4700-Ed9uesZ --verifier-env
|
||||||
|
│ GRADER_SAMPLES=1
|
||||||
|
└ --agent-import-path is deprecated; use --agent instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The replay/regrade is running; I’m monitoring it until the verifier finishes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The grader is still active and has emitted no errors. I’ll continue waiting for the final reward.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The verifier remains healthy but quiet while the grading request processes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Still running without a timeout or exception; I’m keeping the process attached through completion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The grading step is taking several minutes, consistent with the prior regrade; no failure output has appeared.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Ran HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-Ed9uesZ-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2237Z HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary scripts/
|
||||||
|
│ harbor-regrade harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.4700-Ed9uesZ --verifier-env
|
||||||
|
│ GRADER_SAMPLES=1
|
||||||
|
└ --agent-import-path is deprecated; use --agent instead.
|
||||||
|
1/1 Mean: 0.530 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 0:05:42 0:00:00
|
||||||
|
… +22 lines (ctrl + t to view transcript)
|
||||||
|
26-09-23__23-03-40`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Regrade completed successfully:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- New reward: 0.530
|
||||||
|
- Original reward: 0.470
|
||||||
|
- Exceptions: 0
|
||||||
|
- Output: harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-Ed9uesZ-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2237Z/2026-09-23__23-03-40/result.json
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Worked for 6m 6s · done 11:09 PM
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
─ Conversation recap ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The mishandle_pro_v2 reference runs were regraded in rubric-trinary mode; the run completed successfully with a 0.530 reward, up from 0.470, and
|
||||||
|
zero exceptions. The task is complete.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# 3
|
||||||
|
› HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/<run> HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary scripts/harbor-regrade \
|
||||||
|
harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 \
|
||||||
|
harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.5300-8fFS8Dk \
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• I’m using the verifier-only regrade workflow for 8fFS8Dk, with a unique output directory substituted for <run>.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Explored
|
||||||
|
└ Read SKILL.md
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• I’ll use harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-8fFS8Dk-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2310Z for <run>.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
✔ You approved codex to always run commands that start with HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-8fFS8Dk-rubric-trinar...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Running HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-8fFS8Dk-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2310Z HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary
|
||||||
|
│ scripts/harbor-regrade harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.5300-8fFS8Dk --verifier-env
|
||||||
|
│ GRADER_SAMPLES=1
|
||||||
|
└ --agent-import-path is deprecated; use --agent instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The replay and grader are running; I’ll monitor them through completion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The grader is still active with no errors or timeout signal.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• It remains in the grading phase and has not emitted any failure output.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The process is still healthy and attached; I’m waiting for the final verifier summary.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Ran HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-8fFS8Dk-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2310Z HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary scripts/
|
||||||
|
│ harbor-regrade harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.5300-8fFS8Dk --verifier-env
|
||||||
|
│ GRADER_SAMPLES=1
|
||||||
|
└ --agent-import-path is deprecated; use --agent instead.
|
||||||
|
1/1 Mean: 0.560 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 0:04:09 0:00:00
|
||||||
|
… +22 lines (ctrl + t to view transcript)
|
||||||
|
26-09-23__23-15-24`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Regrade completed successfully:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- New reward: 0.560
|
||||||
|
- Original reward: 0.530
|
||||||
|
- Exceptions: 0
|
||||||
|
- Output: harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-8fFS8Dk-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2310Z/2026-09-23__23-15-24/result.json
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Worked for 4m 35s · done 11:19 PM
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# 4
|
||||||
|
› HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/<run> HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary scripts/harbor-regrade \
|
||||||
|
harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 \
|
||||||
|
harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.6300-44bVYzE \
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• I’m using the verifier-only regrade workflow for 44bVYzE, replacing <run> with a unique output directory.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Explored
|
||||||
|
└ Read SKILL.md
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• I’ll use harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-44bVYzE-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2320Z for <run>.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
✔ You approved codex to always run commands that start with HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-44bVYzE-rubric-trinar...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
◦ Running HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-44bVYzE-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2320Z HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary
|
||||||
|
│ scripts/harbor-regrade harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.6300-44bVYzE --verifier-env
|
||||||
|
│ GRADER_SAMPLES=1
|
||||||
|
└ --agent-import-path is deprecated; use --agent instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The replay and grading process is running; I’ll monitor it to completion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• The grader remains active and has produced no error output.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• It is still in the grading phase, with no timeout or exception signal.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Ran HARBOR_REGRADE_OUT=harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-44bVYzE-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2320Z HARBOR_GRADER_MODE=rubric-trinary scripts/
|
||||||
|
│ harbor-regrade harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2 harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/reference-runs/reward-0.6300-44bVYzE --verifier-env
|
||||||
|
│ GRADER_SAMPLES=1
|
||||||
|
└ --agent-import-path is deprecated; use --agent instead.
|
||||||
|
1/1 Mean: 0.570 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 0:03:06 0:00:00
|
||||||
|
… +22 lines (ctrl + t to view transcript)
|
||||||
|
26-09-23__23-21-08`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
• Regrade completed successfully:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- New reward: 0.570
|
||||||
|
- Original reward: 0.630
|
||||||
|
- Exceptions: 0
|
||||||
|
- Output: harbor-jobs/mishandle_pro_v2-regrade-44bVYzE-rubric-trinary-s1-20260923T2320Z/2026-09-23__23-21-08/result.json
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Worked for 3m 50s · done 11:24 PM
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
run, orig, regrad
|
||||||
|
44, .63, .57
|
||||||
|
8f, .53, .56
|
||||||
|
Ed, .47, .53
|
||||||
|
WE, .42, .54
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Gemini evaluation
|
||||||
|
Here is my evaluation of the comparison between your original holistic rewards and the regraded atomic scores:
|
||||||
|
1. Excellent Macro Alignment (Means)
|
||||||
|
Original Mean: 0.51 (0.63, 0.53, 0.47, 0.42)
|
||||||
|
Regraded Mean: 0.55 (0.57, 0.56, 0.53, 0.54)
|
||||||
|
Overall Delta: +0.04
|
||||||
|
The overall average shifted by only 0.04, which indicates strong general alignment between the holistic rubric and the atomic criteria across the batch.
|
||||||
|
2. Individual Delta Tolerance
|
||||||
|
Run 44: 0.63 ➔ 0.57 (Δ -0.06)
|
||||||
|
Run 8f: 0.53 ➔ 0.56 (Δ +0.03)
|
||||||
|
Run Ed: 0.47 ➔ 0.53 (Δ +0.06)
|
||||||
|
Run WE: 0.42 ➔ 0.54 (Δ +0.12)
|
||||||
|
Every individual run moved by less than 0.15, which satisfies the score proximity expectation in generateAtomicRubricAndItsGrades.md.
|
||||||
|
3. Key Finding: Score Compression on Failing Runs
|
||||||
|
Notice that while the top run (44) stayed at the top and close to its original score, the two lowest runs (Ed at 0.47 and WE at 0.42) jumped up to 0.53 and 0.54 under the atomic rubric.
|
||||||
|
Why this happened: This directly matches what we noticed earlier in atomic-rubric.md.txt. In that YAML file, the over-engineering failure mode (avoids-ungrounded-tier-architecture) was set as severity: certain_dealbreaker (weight 5) rather than severity: crux (weight 25).
|
||||||
|
Because it carried a lighter weight in the atomic file, runs that committed over-engineering (WE and Ed) were not pulled below the 0.50 failure threshold during the regrade, causing all 4 runs to cluster tightly between 0.53 and 0.57.
|
||||||
|
Summary & Recommendation
|
||||||
|
If you accept these scores: The agreement is mathematically sound (means match within ~0.04 and individual scores within ~0.12).
|
||||||
|
If you want the atomic scores to reflect the failure mode more sharply: Promoting avoids-ungrounded-tier-architecture to severity: crux in atomic-rubric.yaml will pull WE and Ed back down below 0.50, making the atomic score distribution match the original holistic spread (0.42 to 0.63) even more closely.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user