final detectors - 1 problem

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-coverage.inputs.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-09-25T20:25:25.814Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T16:36:53.325Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-coverage.md

@@ -52,4 +52,4 @@ The holistic rubric contains no heavy penalty targeting the overall score, so th
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-The conversion is equivalent in both directions. All load-bearing requirements, penalty triggers, severity qualifiers, and protected non-triggers map to criteria; the context survives verbatim; no criterion invents scope; and the absence of Crux criteria matches the absence of any overall-score heavy penalty.
+The fresh comparison finds the conversion equivalent in both directions. All load-bearing requirements, penalty triggers, severity qualifiers, and protected non-triggers map to criteria; the context survives verbatim; no criterion invents scope; and the absence of Crux criteria matches the absence of any overall-score heavy penalty.

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-form.inputs.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "version": 1,
-  "capturedAt": "2026-09-25T20:25:25.806Z",
+  "capturedAt": "2026-09-26T16:39:38.284Z",
   "capturedBy": "stamp",
   "inputs": {
     "prompt": "29e2eb28448679a65ae264372ddf7d993e5752d0f295bf5557cc5b1578265a29",

worker-toolkit-potion-polyglot/harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/detectors/detector-rubric-form.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 detector: detector-rubric-form
-verdict: clear
+verdict: material-issues
-confidence: HIGH
+confidence: MEDIUM
 ---
 
 # Rubric-form check: mishandle_pro_v2
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Assessed: harbor-tasks/mishandle_pro_v2/tests/atomic-rubric.yaml
 
 ## Deterministic contract
 
-1. **PASS — Parses as YAML.** The toolkit staging script parsed and staged the file successfully.
+1. **PASS — Parses as YAML.** A fresh YAML parse loaded the file as a mapping with a string `task` and a 14-item `criteria` list.
 2. **PASS — `task` names this task.** The value is `mishandle_pro_v2`.
 3. **PASS — Criteria count.** The file contains 14 criteria.
 4. **PASS — Kebab-case unique ids.** All 14 ids match the required pattern and are unique.
@@ -28,7 +28,12 @@ None found. Each criterion is independently judgeable. The contract-gap and boun
 
 ## Phrasing and answer keys
 
-None found. Factual requirements carry their answer keys inline in bold, while behavioral requirements state observable response properties. Elaborations clarify fulfillment, failure, non-triggers, or charge routing without introducing new requirements.
+### Syntax/lint requirement exists only in an elaboration
+
+- **Criterion:** `normalizes-supported-envelope-shapes`.
+- **Where:** “This criterion fails if flat payloads still crash, the repair breaks compatibility with `_doc`-wrapped payloads, or the change introduces syntax or lint failures that prevent the normalizer from working.”
+- **Why:** The guideline requires dual-envelope runtime behavior and freedom from the stated `TypeError`, but it does not require passing syntax or lint checks. A working normalizer can still fail lint, so this final fail condition is an independent requirement that a grader reading guidelines alone would miss.
+- **Suggested split or rewrite:** Remove the syntax/lint clause from this elaboration and add a standalone guideline such as: “The response's changes should leave **`voice-cloning-job-handler/index.js` syntactically valid and passing the applicable lint checks**.”
 
 ## Fair-grading findings
 
@@ -36,4 +41,4 @@ None found. The paired criteria encode genuinely distinct or escalating failures
 
 ## Overall verdict
 
-The deterministic contract passes in full, and the judgment layer is clear. The rubric is atomic, self-contained, positively phrased, and reachable in the task environment, with explicit routing for its escalation pairs and no unsupported scoring mechanics.
+The deterministic contract passes in full, and the criteria are otherwise atomic, self-contained, positively phrased, and fairly routed. The judgment layer nevertheless has one load-bearing elaboration-discipline failure: syntax/lint validity affects the criterion verdict but appears only in its elaboration. Under this detector's definitions, that drives a `material-issues` verdict until the requirement is moved into a guideline.