remove folder - untrustworthy
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: detector-credential-leakage
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Self-check whether your submission ships credentials or other content from
|
||||
your authoring environment inside its authored surfaces — above all
|
||||
`environment/workspace.patch`. Two tiers. (1) **Known-credential tier
|
||||
(deterministic):** hard-flags your authoring environment's own env vars
|
||||
(`ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`, `ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL`, `USER_ID` as an env
|
||||
assignment) and well-known secret shapes (`sk-ant-…`, AWS `AKIA…`, GitHub
|
||||
`ghp_…`, Google `AIza…`, Stripe secret keys, bearer tokens, private-key
|
||||
blocks, URL-embedded passwords) on lines your patch adds. The canonical
|
||||
incident: your toolkit `.env` — your personal API key, proxy URL, and user
|
||||
id — swept into the workspace as a new `.env` file. (2) **Task-relevance
|
||||
tier (judgment):** content your patch adds that doesn't appear to serve
|
||||
the task — `.env`-style files, env-file symlinks into your home directory,
|
||||
`export FOO=` lines, credential-shaped assignments with real values. A
|
||||
`credential-leak` finding must be acted on before submitting (remove the
|
||||
material AND report the key as compromised so it can be rotated);
|
||||
`suspicious-content` findings are advisory. The report never reproduces
|
||||
secret values. Reads workspace.patch (+ Dockerfile, instruction.md,
|
||||
tests/*.md); runs before or after reference runs exist.
|
||||
allowed-tools: Bash, Read, Write
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Credential-leakage detector
|
||||
|
||||
This skill checks one of your tasks for **credential leakage** — whether
|
||||
anything from your own authoring environment (or any other secret) has been
|
||||
swept into the submission's authored surfaces, above all
|
||||
`environment/workspace.patch`. Everything your patch adds ships to everyone
|
||||
downstream, so a leaked key is compromised the moment you submit: deleting the
|
||||
line later does not un-ship it.
|
||||
|
||||
The failure shape to catch: your toolkit's `.env` — the file holding your
|
||||
personal `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`, `ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL`, and `USER_ID` — landing in
|
||||
the workspace as a new `.env` file (or a `.env.bak-*` backup, or a symlink to
|
||||
`/home/<you>/.env`). It happens easily: a stray `git add`, a working-tree
|
||||
backup, a captured terminal snippet. None of it serves the task; the test
|
||||
agent has no network to use a key with; and the key is now distributed.
|
||||
|
||||
What *doesn't* trip this check: placeholder and example values
|
||||
(`.env.example` with empty or dummy entries, `sk-ant-...` as a literal
|
||||
template, `changeme`), dev-infrastructure defaults (`POSTGRES_PASSWORD=postgres`
|
||||
in a local docker-compose), code identifiers (`USER_ID = 4958` as a test
|
||||
constant), and env vars your task's scenario genuinely needs documented.
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity differs by tier.** Unlike most self-checks, a `credential-leak`
|
||||
finding is not a consideration: remove the material from the patch, rebuild it
|
||||
(`bash scripts/check-workspace-sync.sh --update-patch harbor-tasks/<slug>`),
|
||||
and report the leaked credential through your support channel so it can be
|
||||
rotated — treat it as compromised even after you scrub it.
|
||||
`suspicious-content` findings are the usual advisory kind: read each one and
|
||||
fix or justify it.
|
||||
|
||||
Read these before deciding:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `.claude/skills/_detector-worker-shell.md` — where to write the report and how to handle re-runs.
|
||||
2. `.claude/skills/detector-credential-leakage/core.md` — the two tiers, the deterministic pattern checks to run, the placeholder test, the redaction rule (never quote a secret value), what is NOT a finding, verdict enums, and the body schema.
|
||||
|
||||
Compose the report per the schema in `core.md` and write it per `_detector-worker-shell.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Acting on the verdict
|
||||
|
||||
- **`clean`** — nothing your patch adds looks like a credential or foreign
|
||||
content. Good. Move on.
|
||||
- **`suspicious-content`** — no confirmed credential, but something your patch
|
||||
adds doesn't look like it belongs to the task: an env-file symlink into your
|
||||
home directory, a captured request with a real (if low-sensitivity) token, a
|
||||
config file of credential-shaped values. Fix each finding (replace tokens
|
||||
with placeholders, drop the file, or make its task relevance explicit) or
|
||||
satisfy yourself it's genuinely scenario material.
|
||||
- **`credential-leak`** — a real credential or your authoring environment's
|
||||
own env vars are in the patch. Act before submitting: (1) remove the
|
||||
material and regenerate `workspace.patch`; (2) re-run this detector to
|
||||
confirm it's gone; (3) report the leaked value as compromised so it can be
|
||||
rotated — scrubbing the patch does not un-ship a key that already left your
|
||||
machine in an earlier submission.
|
||||
- **`not-applicable`** — there's no workspace patch to assess yet. Build the
|
||||
workspace first.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user