Moved files around, updated README

Various files from live trading sessions were dumped in the root.
Moved these files sources/misc/ (new folder).
Updated README

sources/create-watchlist-prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+New watchlist. Interview me, then build and run it.
+
+INTERVIEW — exactly 6 questions, quick-answer buttons (or numbered choices in chat), one at a time:
+1. Size bucket: Large ($10B+) | Mid ($2B–10B) | Small ($300M–2B) | Micro (<$300M) | Mixed
+2. Setup (max 2): Short squeeze (high SI + gap) | Gap & momentum | Near 50MA confluence |
+   VWAP pullback | Base/measured-move breakout | Volume breakout
+3. Universe: Full US market | Cha Martin watchlist | My scratchpad file | Sector/theme (free text)
+4. Liquidity floor: $1M | $5M | $20M | $100M avg daily dollar volume | No floor
+5. List size: 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 tickers
+6. Cadence: On-demand only | Daily pre-market 9:15 ET (scheduled job, needs my approval) |
+   Twice daily (9:15 + 11:30 ET) | Intraday every 2h RTH
+Derive the profile name from the answers (e.g. "smallcap-squeeze"). Do not ask more than 6
+questions; fold anything else into sensible defaults and state them.
+
+ARTIFACTS — after the answers:
+- Save the profile as .mari/scratchpad/watchlists/configs/<name>.json
+  (fields: name, created, updated, size_bucket, horizon, screens, min_dollar_volume,
+  market_cap bounds, universe, list_size, sector_rule "avoid_concentration", cadence, notes).
+- Never edit _template/config.json; copy its schema.
+- Run the first scan immediately against live TTG data (snapshot day.vw = session VWAP,
+  day.dv = today dollar volume; market cap verified per finalist via stocks_reference_ticker;
+  ETFs excluded unless I asked for them).
+- Write results to .mari/scratchpad/watchlists/results/<name>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md plus -latest.md
+  mirror, and show me the table in chat: Ticker | Price | VWAP or ref level | % from level |
+  $Vol | Mkt Cap | one-line note, plus one alternate and any rejections with reasons.
+
+RERUN SEMANTICS — going forward, "run my <name> watchlist" = same screens, fresh data, new
+dated file. "Patch <name>: <change>" = edit one field of the JSON, keep history.
+If the button-card renderer fails, fall back to numbered in-chat choices — same flow.

sources/largecap-vwap-pullback.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+Run my largecap-vwap-pullback watchlist.
+
+PROFILE (the 6 answers, saved at .mari/scratchpad/watchlists/configs/largecap-vwap-pullback.json):
+1. Size bucket: Large cap, market cap ≥ $10B (verify per candidate via ticker details — never assume)
+2. Setup: VWAP pullback — price within ±0.35% of live session VWAP, session high at least
+   +0.5% above VWAP (ran up, pulled back to the line), price still above/near VWAP
+3. Universe: full US market (exclude ETFs — require type CS or ADRC in ticker details)
+4. Liquidity: today's dollar volume ≥ $5M (use $25M to pre-narrow, verify $5M floor on finalists)
+5. List size: top 5, ranked by push-above-VWAP depth then dollar volume; max 2 per sector
+6. Cadence: on-demand only ("run my <name> watchlist")
+
+DATA PATH (TTG MCP servers only):
+- One call to ttg-stocks stocks_snapshot_all {include_otc:false} → per-ticker day.vw IS the
+  live session VWAP, day.dv is today's dollar volume, day.h is the session high. No per-ticker
+  bar calls needed. Parse: find '{"mcp_ui"' in the dump → json.loads → ["json"]["tickers"].
+- Market cap only comes from stocks_reference_ticker (market_cap field) — call it per finalist,
+  after narrowing, never before.
+- Screen passes → market-cap + type verification → reject anything under $10B or any ETF
+  (watch for lookalikes: leveraged ETFs like QID/LABD/AAPD, commodity/crypto ETFs like BITO/ETHA).
+
+ARTIFACTS:
+- Save/refresh results at .mari/scratchpad/watchlists/results/<name>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md,
+  mirror to <name>-latest.md, keep dated history.
+- Table columns: Ticker | Price | VWAP | % vs VWAP | % High-over-VWAP | $Vol | Mkt Cap | Note.
+- Include an alternate (6th name) and list any near-miss rejections with the reason (e.g.
+  "AAL cut: $8.6B mcap under the $10B bar").
+
+OUTPUT: the table + one-line trigger note (VWAP reclaim/hold = long trigger, stop under session
+low). Terse. No re-asking the 6 questions — they live in the config file.
+
+Variants — swap only line 1 and the market-cap bar:
+
+Small-cap list: size bucket: small ($300M–2B) → bar becomes ≥$300M, <$2B
+Mid-cap: ≥$2B, <$10B
+Different setup: replace the screen definition in item 2 (e.g., "gap & momentum: day open ≥2% above prev close, dollar volume ≥ 2× 20-day average") — everything else stays
+The profile JSON on disk is the source of truth; this prompt is just its human-readable twin. Say "run my largecap-vwap-pullback watchlist" any time and I execute exactly this.

sources/misc/xpon-squeeze-2026-08-24.md

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+# XPON Short Squeeze — Premarket Signal Reconstruction (2026-08-24)
+
+## The Setup: What a Pre-Open Scanner Would Have Flagged
+
+### 1. Extreme Float Restriction
+- **Free float: 10,684,515 shares** (93.4% of share class)
+- **Total shares outstanding: ~962,335** (weighted: 953,191)
+- **Market cap: $3.27M** — deep micro-cap
+- **22 employees**, listed 2022-04-01, NASDAQ (XNAS)
+- **1-for-12 reverse split** (effective ~2026 Q2) to regain Nasdaq compliance
+- A ~$3.30M market cap with 10.7M free float = tiny tradable universe. Any meaningful buy-side interest moves the tape fast.
+
+### 2. 8/19 Volume Blowout — The "Accumulation Day"
+| Metric | 8/19 (Thu) | Prior days (typical) |
+|--------|-----------|---------------------|
+| Close | $4.43 | $3.30–$3.74 |
+| High | $4.90 | $3.30–$3.74 |
+| Volume | **83,482 shares** | ~300–1,000 shares |
+| $ Volume | $7.37M | <$5K |
+
+- Volume was **~80–250x** the prior 10-day average (~300–700 shares/day).
+- Price went from a 3-week range of $3.18–$3.89 to a **$4.90 intraday high** — a break above the established range.
+- Close at $4.43 held well above the prior range — this is an **accumulation/reversal bar**, not a failed spike.
+- The 8/20–8/22 follow-through: volume stayed elevated (3.8K, 1K, 680) vs. the prior 1K baseline, and price held above $3.60 — confirming the 8/19 move wasn't a one-day fluke.
+
+### 3. Premarket 8/24: The Trigger
+- **Pre-market high: $4.80** (09:24 ET, first 5-min bar: o:3.56 c:4.10 h:4.80 l:3.40, v:1,047,600)
+- That's a **+8.5% gap** above the 8/23 close of $3.435.
+- **Pre-market volume: ~1.94M shares in the first hour** (vs. 83K the prior full day) — **23x the prior day's total volume before the open**.
+- The quote tape shows **bid/ask sizes at 100 shares** throughout pre-market — no institutional size was visible. This was **retail/momentum-driven**, not institutional.
+- The 09:30 open printed at **$7.77** — a **126% gap** above prior close. The open was already 1.7x the premarket high.
+
+### 4. The Squeeze Mechanics (First 2 Hours)
+| Time (ET) | Price | Volume | Notes |
+|-----------|-------|--------|-------|
+| 09:25 | 3.40 → 4.80 | 1.0M | Pre-market trigger |
+| 09:30 | 4.10 → 5.88 | 4.4M | Open + first 5 min |
+| 09:35 | 5.90 → 6.45 | 3.3M | Acceleration |
+| 09:40 | 6.17 → 6.18 | 1.7M | Consolidation |
+| 09:45 | 6.18 → 7.58 | 3.8M | Second wave |
+| 09:50 | 7.58 → 8.64 | 3.4M | **High: $9.03** |
+| 09:55 | 8.67 → 8.18 | 2.0M | First fade |
+| 10:00 | 8.20 → 8.70 | 1.6M | Retest |
+| 10:05 | 8.70 → 9.84 | 2.4M | **High: $9.99** |
+| 10:10 | 9.83 → 8.45 | 2.1M | Sharp reversal |
+| 10:15 | 8.43 → 8.18 | 0.7M | Consolidation |
+
+- **Intraday high: $9.99** (+191% from prior close) at ~10:05 AM ET
+- **First 15 min volume: ~13M shares** — 150x the prior day's total
+- The 10:05 high at $9.99 was a **psychological round number** — classic momentum exhaustion
+- After 10:15, price faded to $6.31 by mid-morning (low of $6.31 at ~11:30)
+- **Closed at $7.36** (+114% from prior close) — gave back ~26% of the gains
+
+### 5. Why Mike Edwards Would Have Flagged This
+
+A short-squeeze scanner (or discretionary premarket review) would have scored XPON high on:
+
+1. **Float size**: $3.3M market cap, 10.7M free float — one of the most restricted floats in the market
+2. **Volume spike**: 8/19 was 80–250x normal — the "something changed" signal
+3. **Price range break**: 8/19 broke the 3-week $3.18–$3.89 range with a $4.90 high
+4. **Follow-through**: 8/20–8/22 held above the prior range with elevated volume
+5. **Premarket gap**: +8.5% gap to $4.80 before the open — confirming momentum
+6. **Premarket volume**: 1.94M shares pre-market = 23x prior day — "the market is paying attention"
+7. **Thin liquidity**: 100-share bid/ask sizes = no institutional selling wall, retail/momentum can drive price
+8. **Reverse split**: Fresh off a 1-for-12 reverse split — stock was recently reset, new float, new retail interest
+9. **Nasdaq compliance regained**: The reverse split was to fix compliance — "clean bill of health" for short-sellers (reduced short borrow risk)
+10. **No options market**: No listed options = no hedging mechanism for short-sellers → they can only cover
+
+### 6. What Went Wrong (Post-Open Fade)
+- The 10:05 high at $9.99 was a **blow-off top** — no follow-through, sharp reversal
+- $9.99 → $6.31 in ~90 minutes = **-37% from the high**
+- The close at $7.36 held above the open ($7.77) — "strong" close for a +114% day, but gave back 26%
+- **No fundamental catalyst**: Q2 revenue down 32% YoY, net loss, declining cash — this was pure momentum/squeeze, not a fundamental move
+- The 8/19 volume spike may have been **positioning by a single entity or small group** rather than broad institutional interest
+
+### 7. Risk Assessment for a Pre-Open Entry
+- **Entry**: ~$4.10 (first 5-min close) to ~$5.88 (end of first 5 min)
+- **Target**: $9.99 (10:05 high) = +70% to +140% from entry
+- **Stop**: $3.40 (pre-market low) = -17% to -42% risk
+- **R:R at $4.10 entry**: 70%/17% = 4.1:1 (excellent)
+- **R:R at $5.88 entry**: 70%/42% = 1.7:1 (marginal)
+- **Risk**: Squeeze stocks can reverse 50%+ in minutes. The 10:05→10:10 fade was $9.84→$8.45 = -14% in 5 minutes.
+
+### 8. Key Takeaway
+XPON was a **textbook micro-cap short squeeze setup**:
+- Tiny float + volume spike + range break + premarket gap + thin liquidity
+- The squeeze worked (191% intraday gain) but faded hard
+- The **premarket signals were strong** — a scanner would have ranked this in the top 5-10 premarket names
+- The **risk/reward was excellent** at pre-market prices but degraded fast once price ran
+- **No fundamental catalyst** = the move was purely mechanical (short covering + momentum)